Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Side 41

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Side 41
COLOUR INHERITANCE IN ICELANDIC SHEEP 39 some matings than in others one may as- sume that the observed anomalies are some- what below the actual number of discrep- ancies that could occur. The exceptions are so few, however, that the main hypothesis about the allelic systern at the A-locus explains the results reasonably well. Each exception, on the other hand, could throw some new light on the inheritance of the colours and each case will therefore be treated separately in the following. 1. Individual cases. Case 1. Mating X A5A5. Two nonwhite lambs. One of the lambs was born on farm No. 4. Date of mating 5/1/1960, date of lamb- ing 30/5/1960. Two lambs, white male and grey male. The sire No. 04008, genotype AjAj----- ---, was very well tested previously and never gave any nonwhite lamb except this one. The dam, No. 04036, black, genotype AgAgB^—SjS^, had previously given 5 white lambs when mated to homozygous white sires, 2 black lambs, one of tliem with white markings, when mated to a black sire with white markings of geno- type A5AgB^B^S^S^, and two black lambs when mated to a black sire of genotype AgAgB^B^S^- . l’he jrrobability that the dam carried a dominant gene which suppressed white was therefore less than 0.05, and the prob- ability that she carried any unmanifested allele other than Ag was 0.0625 or less. The ewe was therefore unusually well tested with respect to both these possibilities. Another ram used on the farm in the same year, No. 04011, genotype A-^AoBjB^ S^Sj, could have been the sire of these lambs. In case of correct record the lamb can only be explained by either a mutation of Ax to A2 or by some kind of an inter- action between the gene for white and rare unknown genes presumably obtained from both parents and therefore recessive. As the lambs could be produced by an- other sire on the same farm in the same year that seems a more likely explanation. Mismothering is also a possibility. The second lamb was born on farm No. 5. Date of mating 12/1/1956, date of lamb- ing unknown. One lamb, a brown female with white markings. The sire, No. 01509, genotype A^A^ — ----- —, was extremely well tested, and this was the only exception among liis jiro- geny. The dam, No. 05116, brown, genotyjre AgAgB^B^S^S^, had altogether 10 white lambs out of other matings to homozvgous white sires, and further one black lamb when mated to a white sire of genotype AjAgB^BjSjS^. The probability that she carried a dominant gene which sujrpressed white colour was therefore extremely low. The brown ewe lamb born in 1956 was kept for breeding. She had altogether 6 lambs wlien mated to homozygous white sires, all of them white. When mated to a white sire of genotype A^A^BjBo------- she had twins, one white and the other darkgrey. Both dam and daughter therefore seem- ed to give jrrogeny witli colours that woukl be expected from ordinary brown ewes. Faulty jrarentage and mismothering can most likely be excluded because no other sire used on the farm in that year was known to carry genes for both brown jiig- ment and white markings. This case seems therefore to have been a mutation from Ax to Ag. As sire No. 01509 was homozygous white his genotype with respect to pigment and
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140

x

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1499

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.