Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Qupperneq 41

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Qupperneq 41
COLOUR INHERITANCE IN ICELANDIC SHEEP 39 some matings than in others one may as- sume that the observed anomalies are some- what below the actual number of discrep- ancies that could occur. The exceptions are so few, however, that the main hypothesis about the allelic systern at the A-locus explains the results reasonably well. Each exception, on the other hand, could throw some new light on the inheritance of the colours and each case will therefore be treated separately in the following. 1. Individual cases. Case 1. Mating X A5A5. Two nonwhite lambs. One of the lambs was born on farm No. 4. Date of mating 5/1/1960, date of lamb- ing 30/5/1960. Two lambs, white male and grey male. The sire No. 04008, genotype AjAj----- ---, was very well tested previously and never gave any nonwhite lamb except this one. The dam, No. 04036, black, genotype AgAgB^—SjS^, had previously given 5 white lambs when mated to homozygous white sires, 2 black lambs, one of tliem with white markings, when mated to a black sire with white markings of geno- type A5AgB^B^S^S^, and two black lambs when mated to a black sire of genotype AgAgB^B^S^- . l’he jrrobability that the dam carried a dominant gene which suppressed white was therefore less than 0.05, and the prob- ability that she carried any unmanifested allele other than Ag was 0.0625 or less. The ewe was therefore unusually well tested with respect to both these possibilities. Another ram used on the farm in the same year, No. 04011, genotype A-^AoBjB^ S^Sj, could have been the sire of these lambs. In case of correct record the lamb can only be explained by either a mutation of Ax to A2 or by some kind of an inter- action between the gene for white and rare unknown genes presumably obtained from both parents and therefore recessive. As the lambs could be produced by an- other sire on the same farm in the same year that seems a more likely explanation. Mismothering is also a possibility. The second lamb was born on farm No. 5. Date of mating 12/1/1956, date of lamb- ing unknown. One lamb, a brown female with white markings. The sire, No. 01509, genotype A^A^ — ----- —, was extremely well tested, and this was the only exception among liis jiro- geny. The dam, No. 05116, brown, genotyjre AgAgB^B^S^S^, had altogether 10 white lambs out of other matings to homozvgous white sires, and further one black lamb when mated to a white sire of genotype AjAgB^BjSjS^. The probability that she carried a dominant gene which sujrpressed white colour was therefore extremely low. The brown ewe lamb born in 1956 was kept for breeding. She had altogether 6 lambs wlien mated to homozygous white sires, all of them white. When mated to a white sire of genotype A^A^BjBo------- she had twins, one white and the other darkgrey. Both dam and daughter therefore seem- ed to give jrrogeny witli colours that woukl be expected from ordinary brown ewes. Faulty jrarentage and mismothering can most likely be excluded because no other sire used on the farm in that year was known to carry genes for both brown jiig- ment and white markings. This case seems therefore to have been a mutation from Ax to Ag. As sire No. 01509 was homozygous white his genotype with respect to pigment and
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140

x

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1499

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.