Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1979, Page 35

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1979, Page 35
Land Tenure, Fowling Rights, and Sharing of the Catch 43 to this rule: anyone who had caught less than forty puffins might keep his catch for himself — minus the landpartur — but then, of course, he did not share with the other parti- cipants. This rule may be explained in a number of ways (and will be treated in detail elsewhere). Finally, in the village of Dalur on Sandoy the yearly village meeting (grannaslevna) agreed upon a quota for the puffin catch in the only lundaland belonging to the village. The total land of the village is 23 merkur, i. e. 368 gyllin, and for each gyllin the owner might catch V368 of the total catch allowed. There are few sessir in the lundaland so each third of the village spends two days of the week fowling. Each man goes to the lundaland as long as his quota has not been filled. One man is appointed accountant, each fowler reporting to him when he leaves (so that only appropriate sessir are occupied) and upon return (to report the number of puffins caught). As accountant’s share he was paid 1 out of 100 puffins. Fowling rights are automatically incident to land tenure — often accompanied by limiting regulations (e. g. a "ban on solo fowling). As the social structure was changed by population growth this connection could not be maintained, and the rights were secured by a ban on fowling without permission. Usually permission was only granted provided a share of the catch was paid as landpartur. In some villages the rein was slackened totally, so that anyone might go fowling provided he paid landpartur. Finally it must be mentioned that a whole series of special rules and agreements secured the bird population against over- exploitation, but that will be the subject of a separate paper. Other rights Land tenure in general involving the use of commons and sharing of the profit constitutes a complicated pattern which will demand separate treatment (see e. g. Landhokommission, 1911). But the tending of the sheep shows immediate parallels to fowling in the division of labour. In some villages each man
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.