Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1979, Page 68

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1979, Page 68
76 The Case of »Hernilds kvæði and that until he has secured an effect satisfying to his taste. The essential difference between the two processes lies in the unconsciousness of the folk-musician, whose ex- periments are not directed towards a desired end but are the random efforts of a moment. Is it too much to suppose that what some individuals have not been able to refrain from doing with melodies, other individuals have done with the words of the ballads?1 According to this view, it is assumed that changes introduced into ballad texts by either memory lapses or creative impulses are limited, random acts: thus, widely varying texts reflect the cumulative effect of many such acts and presuppose a long history in oral tradition. Although in most instances variant texts of a single ballad type do differ in limited, random ways, occasionally there are to be found in tradition variants that are so dissimilar that they may even be taken as representing different ballad types. One such case is the several Norwegian texts collected by Sophus Bugge, some of which were entitled »Here Pær a stolts Gunnild« (Bugge 163) and others, »Knut konungen rider ut« (Bugge 191). Leiv Heggstad and H. Griiner-Nielsen later re- cognized these as independent versions of the same ballad type and categorized them as such in Utsyn yver gamal norsk folke- visedikting (1912) under a new title »Den utrue egtemann« (Utsyn 137). In his article »‘Den utrue egtemann’: A Nor- wegian Ballad and Formulaic Composition« (1963) W. Edson Richmond has argued that the widely varying texts of »Den utrue egtemann« could not have been produced by communal recreation: the low number of texts collected (three complete texts and one fragment) would seem to indicate that this ballad type had not had a long enough life in tradition for this gra- dual process, as it is described by Sharp and Gerould, to have produced such profound changes. Instead, Richmond suggests that it is most likely that these changes came about by formu- laic composition, a mode of performance in which singers re-
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.