Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1979, Side 68

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1979, Side 68
76 The Case of »Hernilds kvæði and that until he has secured an effect satisfying to his taste. The essential difference between the two processes lies in the unconsciousness of the folk-musician, whose ex- periments are not directed towards a desired end but are the random efforts of a moment. Is it too much to suppose that what some individuals have not been able to refrain from doing with melodies, other individuals have done with the words of the ballads?1 According to this view, it is assumed that changes introduced into ballad texts by either memory lapses or creative impulses are limited, random acts: thus, widely varying texts reflect the cumulative effect of many such acts and presuppose a long history in oral tradition. Although in most instances variant texts of a single ballad type do differ in limited, random ways, occasionally there are to be found in tradition variants that are so dissimilar that they may even be taken as representing different ballad types. One such case is the several Norwegian texts collected by Sophus Bugge, some of which were entitled »Here Pær a stolts Gunnild« (Bugge 163) and others, »Knut konungen rider ut« (Bugge 191). Leiv Heggstad and H. Griiner-Nielsen later re- cognized these as independent versions of the same ballad type and categorized them as such in Utsyn yver gamal norsk folke- visedikting (1912) under a new title »Den utrue egtemann« (Utsyn 137). In his article »‘Den utrue egtemann’: A Nor- wegian Ballad and Formulaic Composition« (1963) W. Edson Richmond has argued that the widely varying texts of »Den utrue egtemann« could not have been produced by communal recreation: the low number of texts collected (three complete texts and one fragment) would seem to indicate that this ballad type had not had a long enough life in tradition for this gra- dual process, as it is described by Sharp and Gerould, to have produced such profound changes. Instead, Richmond suggests that it is most likely that these changes came about by formu- laic composition, a mode of performance in which singers re-
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.