Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1978, Side 30

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1978, Side 30
38 Sniolvs kvæði the tættir about Sniolv, Sniolvs táttur and Ásmundar táttur, and thus give evidence for the existence of an independent ballad about Sniolv in Faroese tradition. But no matter what prehistory this frame structure might suggest for Svabo’s ver- sion of Sniolvs kvæði, it functions to bind the four txttir into a compact unit that gives the impression of a story completely told. Although we do not know where or from whom Svabo collected Sniolvs kvæði in 1781—1782, we nonetheless do know that his text is not a fragment. When Johannes Clemensen recorded Sniolvs kvæði for Hent- ze’s collection in 1819 from an anonymous singer on Sandoy, it consisted of no less than seven tættir: (1) Rana táttur, (2) Sniolvs táttur, (3) Golmars táttur, (4) Hildibrands táttur, (5) Virgars táttur, (6) Ásmundar táttur, and (7) Gríms táttur. Not only does Clemensen’s text contain three more tættir than Svabo’s, but it has also reversed the order of Golmars táttur and Sniolvs táttur. Furthermore, to complicate matters, Cle- mensen recorded Sniolvs kvæði again in 1821, but this time identifying his singer as Peder Lukassen from Skálavík on Sandoy. Clemensen’s 1821 text is not the same as his 1819 text — besides differences in wording and stanza order, it contains two additional tættir, Hildardalsstríð and Risin á Blálandi, which were sung immediately preceding the last tátt- ur, Gríms táttur. The Sniolv cycle as it was known from Clemensen’s Sandoy texts of 1819 and 1821 contained roughly twice as many tættir as Svabo’s text from 1781—1782. Since it has already been established that Svabo’s text represents not a fragmentary but rather a complete and probably stable form of the cycle, then the Sandoy texts by comparison must reflect a vigorously ex- panding, popular tradition. If this is so, then where did the additional tættir comprising Sniolvs kvæði as it was known on Sandoy come from? Were they already extant ballads that came to be incorporated into the Sniolv cycle, or were they new compositions? All five of the additional tættir found in the Sandoy texts
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.