Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Side 38

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Side 38
36 ÍSLENZKAR LANDBÚNAÐARRANNSÓKNIR The genotyping was based on the as- sumption that the colours could be ex- plained in terms of genes at the three loci, A, B and S, as describecl previously, p. 26. For genotyping individual ewes their own colour was the first criterion. White ewes were always assumed to carry A1( and if they came from white parents and had never given any nonwhite progeny they could not be genotyped any further. Their genotype was then written as 1........., where the dots represent unknown genes. During punching, only the first of the 6 columns in the card reserved for the geno- type was punched and the others left blank. II a wliite ewe was known to be the daughter of a black sire, her genotype was punched as 15 ...., if nothing was known about the sire’s genotype with respect to brown colour and white markings, and if no further information about the ewe’s genotype could be obtained from her own progeny. For a white ewe out of a white dam and a brown sire with white mark- ings the genotype was punched as 15.2.2. the blanks representing the unknown genes at loci B and S, which she had received from the dam. If the tliird lamb of a ewe of this parentage had a brown sire with white markings and was black without white markings, this lamb woulcl be taken as a proof that the ewe was of the geno- type A^AgB^B^S^So, which was then punched as 151212. This would then be punched as her genotype in all cards carry- ing records made one year after this dis- covery and later. For records made up to and including the discovery of the previ- ously unknown genes, the same genotype would also be punched in the cards, but an X (11-punch) would be punched above the newly discoverecl genes iu all cards up to and including the year of discovery. l’he first three cards for the ewe in the above example would then have had the X X genotypes punched as 151212 (or 15J2J2)> while in all subsequent cards the genotype would be punched as 151212. The above distinction between genes known prior to and subsequent to a parti- cular mating was made in order to use in- formation after the particular mating as a mating of a known genotype. Matings prior to the discovery were on the other hand sometimes used in connection with genotyping of rams. When tlie ewes had been genotyped and all necessary non-numerical information cod- ed the data were punched and the punched cards checked as described previously. During the punching, no information about the genotype of the ram was punch- ed into the cards. After the punching was completed, liowever, the cards were sorted on main colour of lamb, genotype of dam, year of record and ram number, and only one locus of genotype of dam was taken into account at a time. After the first sorting, the cards were available in order according to ram, year on record sorted within each ram, geno- type of ewe at the A-locus sorted within year with zone punching in genotype sup- pressed, and colour of lambs sorted within genotype of ewe. The cards were now run through a tabulator and counts made for lambs of each colour within genotype of ewe, record year and ram number. From these tables and from the colour of the sire and the information about the colour of his par- ents, his genotype at locus A was deter- mined. When all rariis had thus been geno- typed with respect to the A-locus, the cards were again sorted in a similar way, but now with respect to the B-locus,! and fin- ally for the S-locus. When rams were geno- typed with respect to the S-locus, the cards were sorted on 3rd and 4th digit of lamb colour, and not on main colour.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140

x

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1499

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.