Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Síða 38

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Síða 38
36 ÍSLENZKAR LANDBÚNAÐARRANNSÓKNIR The genotyping was based on the as- sumption that the colours could be ex- plained in terms of genes at the three loci, A, B and S, as describecl previously, p. 26. For genotyping individual ewes their own colour was the first criterion. White ewes were always assumed to carry A1( and if they came from white parents and had never given any nonwhite progeny they could not be genotyped any further. Their genotype was then written as 1........., where the dots represent unknown genes. During punching, only the first of the 6 columns in the card reserved for the geno- type was punched and the others left blank. II a wliite ewe was known to be the daughter of a black sire, her genotype was punched as 15 ...., if nothing was known about the sire’s genotype with respect to brown colour and white markings, and if no further information about the ewe’s genotype could be obtained from her own progeny. For a white ewe out of a white dam and a brown sire with white mark- ings the genotype was punched as 15.2.2. the blanks representing the unknown genes at loci B and S, which she had received from the dam. If the tliird lamb of a ewe of this parentage had a brown sire with white markings and was black without white markings, this lamb woulcl be taken as a proof that the ewe was of the geno- type A^AgB^B^S^So, which was then punched as 151212. This would then be punched as her genotype in all cards carry- ing records made one year after this dis- covery and later. For records made up to and including the discovery of the previ- ously unknown genes, the same genotype would also be punched in the cards, but an X (11-punch) would be punched above the newly discoverecl genes iu all cards up to and including the year of discovery. l’he first three cards for the ewe in the above example would then have had the X X genotypes punched as 151212 (or 15J2J2)> while in all subsequent cards the genotype would be punched as 151212. The above distinction between genes known prior to and subsequent to a parti- cular mating was made in order to use in- formation after the particular mating as a mating of a known genotype. Matings prior to the discovery were on the other hand sometimes used in connection with genotyping of rams. When tlie ewes had been genotyped and all necessary non-numerical information cod- ed the data were punched and the punched cards checked as described previously. During the punching, no information about the genotype of the ram was punch- ed into the cards. After the punching was completed, liowever, the cards were sorted on main colour of lamb, genotype of dam, year of record and ram number, and only one locus of genotype of dam was taken into account at a time. After the first sorting, the cards were available in order according to ram, year on record sorted within each ram, geno- type of ewe at the A-locus sorted within year with zone punching in genotype sup- pressed, and colour of lambs sorted within genotype of ewe. The cards were now run through a tabulator and counts made for lambs of each colour within genotype of ewe, record year and ram number. From these tables and from the colour of the sire and the information about the colour of his par- ents, his genotype at locus A was deter- mined. When all rariis had thus been geno- typed with respect to the A-locus, the cards were again sorted in a similar way, but now with respect to the B-locus,! and fin- ally for the S-locus. When rams were geno- typed with respect to the S-locus, the cards were sorted on 3rd and 4th digit of lamb colour, and not on main colour.
Síða 1
Síða 2
Síða 3
Síða 4
Síða 5
Síða 6
Síða 7
Síða 8
Síða 9
Síða 10
Síða 11
Síða 12
Síða 13
Síða 14
Síða 15
Síða 16
Síða 17
Síða 18
Síða 19
Síða 20
Síða 21
Síða 22
Síða 23
Síða 24
Síða 25
Síða 26
Síða 27
Síða 28
Síða 29
Síða 30
Síða 31
Síða 32
Síða 33
Síða 34
Síða 35
Síða 36
Síða 37
Síða 38
Síða 39
Síða 40
Síða 41
Síða 42
Síða 43
Síða 44
Síða 45
Síða 46
Síða 47
Síða 48
Síða 49
Síða 50
Síða 51
Síða 52
Síða 53
Síða 54
Síða 55
Síða 56
Síða 57
Síða 58
Síða 59
Síða 60
Síða 61
Síða 62
Síða 63
Síða 64
Síða 65
Síða 66
Síða 67
Síða 68
Síða 69
Síða 70
Síða 71
Síða 72
Síða 73
Síða 74
Síða 75
Síða 76
Síða 77
Síða 78
Síða 79
Síða 80
Síða 81
Síða 82
Síða 83
Síða 84
Síða 85
Síða 86
Síða 87
Síða 88
Síða 89
Síða 90
Síða 91
Síða 92
Síða 93
Síða 94
Síða 95
Síða 96
Síða 97
Síða 98
Síða 99
Síða 100
Síða 101
Síða 102
Síða 103
Síða 104
Síða 105
Síða 106
Síða 107
Síða 108
Síða 109
Síða 110
Síða 111
Síða 112
Síða 113
Síða 114
Síða 115
Síða 116
Síða 117
Síða 118
Síða 119
Síða 120
Síða 121
Síða 122
Síða 123
Síða 124
Síða 125
Síða 126
Síða 127
Síða 128
Síða 129
Síða 130
Síða 131
Síða 132
Síða 133
Síða 134
Síða 135
Síða 136
Síða 137
Síða 138
Síða 139
Síða 140

x

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir

Beinleiðis leinki

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1499

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.