Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Page 38

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Page 38
36 ÍSLENZKAR LANDBÚNAÐARRANNSÓKNIR The genotyping was based on the as- sumption that the colours could be ex- plained in terms of genes at the three loci, A, B and S, as describecl previously, p. 26. For genotyping individual ewes their own colour was the first criterion. White ewes were always assumed to carry A1( and if they came from white parents and had never given any nonwhite progeny they could not be genotyped any further. Their genotype was then written as 1........., where the dots represent unknown genes. During punching, only the first of the 6 columns in the card reserved for the geno- type was punched and the others left blank. II a wliite ewe was known to be the daughter of a black sire, her genotype was punched as 15 ...., if nothing was known about the sire’s genotype with respect to brown colour and white markings, and if no further information about the ewe’s genotype could be obtained from her own progeny. For a white ewe out of a white dam and a brown sire with white mark- ings the genotype was punched as 15.2.2. the blanks representing the unknown genes at loci B and S, which she had received from the dam. If the tliird lamb of a ewe of this parentage had a brown sire with white markings and was black without white markings, this lamb woulcl be taken as a proof that the ewe was of the geno- type A^AgB^B^S^So, which was then punched as 151212. This would then be punched as her genotype in all cards carry- ing records made one year after this dis- covery and later. For records made up to and including the discovery of the previ- ously unknown genes, the same genotype would also be punched in the cards, but an X (11-punch) would be punched above the newly discoverecl genes iu all cards up to and including the year of discovery. l’he first three cards for the ewe in the above example would then have had the X X genotypes punched as 151212 (or 15J2J2)> while in all subsequent cards the genotype would be punched as 151212. The above distinction between genes known prior to and subsequent to a parti- cular mating was made in order to use in- formation after the particular mating as a mating of a known genotype. Matings prior to the discovery were on the other hand sometimes used in connection with genotyping of rams. When tlie ewes had been genotyped and all necessary non-numerical information cod- ed the data were punched and the punched cards checked as described previously. During the punching, no information about the genotype of the ram was punch- ed into the cards. After the punching was completed, liowever, the cards were sorted on main colour of lamb, genotype of dam, year of record and ram number, and only one locus of genotype of dam was taken into account at a time. After the first sorting, the cards were available in order according to ram, year on record sorted within each ram, geno- type of ewe at the A-locus sorted within year with zone punching in genotype sup- pressed, and colour of lambs sorted within genotype of ewe. The cards were now run through a tabulator and counts made for lambs of each colour within genotype of ewe, record year and ram number. From these tables and from the colour of the sire and the information about the colour of his par- ents, his genotype at locus A was deter- mined. When all rariis had thus been geno- typed with respect to the A-locus, the cards were again sorted in a similar way, but now with respect to the B-locus,! and fin- ally for the S-locus. When rams were geno- typed with respect to the S-locus, the cards were sorted on 3rd and 4th digit of lamb colour, and not on main colour.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140

x

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1499

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.