Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði - 01.01.1992, Síða 62

60 Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson
Jakob Jóh. Smári. 1920. íslenzk setningafrœði. BókaverzlunÁrsæls Ámasonar, Reykja-
vík.
Johannessen, JanneBondi. 1992. Re: 3.648 Drift. Linguist List 3.651 (25.ágúst 1992).
[anonymous@linguistics.archive.umich.edu: linguistics/linguist.list/volume.3/
no.651-700.]
Jón Gunnarsson. 1973. Málmyndunarfrœði. Iðunn, Reykjavík.
Kress, Bruno. 1982. Islándische Grammatik. VEB Verlag Enzyklopádie, Leipzig.
Kristján Ámason. 1980. íslensk málfrœði. Kennslubók handa framhaldsskólum. Seinni
hluti. Iðunn, Reykjavík.
Orðabók Menningarsjóðs = íslensk orðabók handa skólum og almenningi. Ritstjóri
Ámi Böðvarsson. 2. útg. Bókaútgáfa Menningarsjóðs, Reykjavík, 1983.
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doktorsritgerð, MIT,
Cambridge, Mass.
Sigfús Blöndal. 1920-24. íslensk-dönsk orðabók. Reykjavík.
Stefán Einarsson. 1949. Icelandic. Grammar. Texts. Glossary. The Johns Hopkins
Press, Baltimore.
Sveinbjöm Egilsson. 1913-16. Lexicon Poeticum antiquœ linguœ septentrionalis. Ord-
bog over det norsk-islandske skjaldesprog oprindelig forfattet af Sveinbjöm Eg-
ilsson. Forpget og pány udgivet for Det kongelige nordiske Oldskriftselskab ved
Finnur Jónsson. Kpbenhavn.
SUMMARY
This paper discusses the function and meaning of the word nema ‘unless, except,
but’. Most grammar books classify this word as a subordinate (conditional) conjunction,
and describe it as the “negative counterpart” of ef ‘if’. However, the author argues that
the meaning of nema is not ‘if not’; nema always implies or introduces an exception
from the previous statement (or command, wish etc.). /Vema-clauses also differ from
(most) other subordinate clauses (including e/-clauses) in that they cannot be fronted.
It is shown in this paper that nema has many disguises, so to speak. It is sometimes
used as a coordinate conjunction (roughly comparable to en ‘but’). When nema is a
coordinate conjunction, Conjunction Reduction of the second conjunct is possible, as
it is with most coordinate conjunctions, but unlike subordinate conjunctions; and nema
can be used to conjoin phrases. Nema can also be used as some sort of complemen-
tizer introducing interrogative complement clauses. Furthermore, nema can introduce
infinitival clauses with (controlled or arbitrary) PRO-subjects. In some such clauses,
gapping is also involved. It is a bit surprising that nema can introduce PRO-clauses;
it has previously been thought that all such clauses in Icelandic are introduced by
að ‘that’ (or a conjuntion ending in að, such as til þess að ‘in order to’, án þess að
‘without’, etc.).
There are, however, even more possibilities. It is clear that sometimes, nema cannot
be classified as any kind of conjunction, but must instead be considered an adverb.