Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.05.1978, Qupperneq 25

Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.05.1978, Qupperneq 25
Paper on XVI. Nordiske Bheumatologkongress 21-23. June 1976. N. Sigfusson, O.J. Björnsson, 6. Ólafsson, E. Allander & J. Thorsteinsson. The symptom of joint pain and a test for rheumatoid factor are both used in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. It is therefore of interest to know if there is any association between joint pain on one hand and rheumatoid factor on the other. To answer this question I would like to pre- sent results from the health survey which was described in some detail by the previous speaker dr. Kolbeinsson. Also here only women will be considered. The second stage of this survey was conducted in 197J - '72 and comprised approx. 4.000 women aged 37-64 years. A health questionnaire was used to find out about symptoms from the joints. There were 4 questions on this: 1. Have you had pain in the joints? 2. Have you had swelling of the joints? 3. Have you had morning stiffness of the joints? 4. Have you had pain in at least 3 limb joints simultainously ? The tests for rheumatoid factor were the Rose- Waaler test and the acryl fixation test. These have already been described by dr. Kolbeinsson. Before I go further I would like to point out that the results here presented are preliminary. Slide 1 . The first table shows the relationship between the RW-test and the question: Have you had pain in the joints ? There were approx. 1100 women or 29% of the population who had joint pain. The prevalence of pos. RW in the joint pain group is 3.2% or more than two times higher than in the no joint pain group. This is a higly significant difference. Slide 2. This table shows the relationship between the RW-test and the question: Have you had any swelling of the joints? There were 564 women that registered RHEUMATOID FACTOR AND JOINT PAIN this symptom or 14% of the total population. In this joint swelling group 287o of the RW- positives were found. The prevalence ofpos. RW in the joint swelling group is 3.9% or 2 1/2 times higher than in the no swelling group. The difference is highly significant. SI i d e 3 . This table shows the relation between the RW-test and the question: Have you had morning stiffness of the joints? The prevalence of pos. RW in the stiffness group was 2.6% or 1 1/2 times higher than in the no stiffness group. The differenee in this case is not significant. Slide 4. This table shows the relationship between the RW-test and the question: Have you had pain in at least 3 limb joints simultainously ? Approx. 1 í>/o of the women had this symptom. The prevalence of pos.RW in the pain group was 3.C% and in the no pain group 1.87o. The difference is almost significant. Siide 5. This table shows the relationship between the RW-test and at least three of the previous 4 questions. Those who answered at least 3 questions with a yes were 590 or approx. 1 37o of the total. The prevalence of pos. RW in the yes group was 3.7% or more than 2 times higher than in the other group. The difference is highly significant. The AFT has been investigated in the same way as the RW-test and the results were much the same. To sum up it can be stated what in women each of the symptoms of joint pain, joint sweiling, and pain in 3 or more limb joints is associated with rheumatoid factor in such a way that a positive rheumatoid factor is approx. twice as common in women with these symptoms than those who are symptom free. 23
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158

x

Læknablaðið : fylgirit

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið : fylgirit
https://timarit.is/publication/991

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.