Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.05.1978, Side 118

Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.05.1978, Side 118
Ingvar Teitsson stud. med. and Jon Thorsteinsson dosent. From the Medical Clinic of Landspitalinn (The National Hospital), University Hospital, Reykjavik. Abstract: By investigating hospital archives a total of 52 definite and suspected SLE-cases were found in the years 1956-*75. We estimated 31 of these as definite, 26 females and 5 males. The incidence of definite SLE in Iceland in 1971- '75 was 12,3/year/million inhabitants. By the end of 1975 the prevalence was 86,9/million. Age distribution at the time of diagnosis was 10-65 years. By Dec. 1975 12 of the definite cases had deceased, six from uremia. Having collected blood samples from 18 definite plus six suspected SLE-patients we noted a statisti- cally significant increase of HLA-B27 antigen frequency among these. Also less significant increase of HLA-A9 was noted. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a disease which just some 30 years ago was only badly defined. Gradually, with the description of the LE-cell phenomenon (1948), the immuno- fluorescent ANF-test (1957) and not least with the publication of the ARA- preliminary criteria for the classification of SLE’), the disease has become better known. Increasing awareness against SLE may explain in part the steadily increasing reported incidence of this disease in the Western World over the last decades. The main aim of the present study which started late in 1975 was to get an impression of the incidence, prevalence and manifestations of SLE in Iceland during the last decade or two. Also it seemed interesting to get information about some genetic aspects of the SLE-patients, esp. their histocompatibility antigens, there being currently great interest in the question about assoeiation between HL-A and disease. Materials and methods: The archives of the major hospitals in Iceland were investigated for SLE-diagnoses during the last 10-20 years, depending on how early the individual hospitals startet making indexes of thelr diagnoses, see table 1. All those case histories which at some time had got the diagnosis SLE were carefully read through. Thus we determined the number of the ARA- ;jreliminary criteria for the classification of SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS IN ICELAND Hospital years investigated Landspitalinn, the National Hospital, Reykjavik 1957-1975 Borgarspitalinn, the Reykjavik City Hospital, Reykjavik 1956-1975 Landakostsspitalinn, the St. Joseph's Hospital, Reykjavik 1965-1975 Fjordungssjukrahusid, the District Hospital, Akureyri 1962-1975 Table 1: Hospitals the archives of which were investigated SLE2) which each patient seems to have fulfilied. We classified the cases as definite SLE only if they fulfilled at least four of the ARA-criteria. We also included one case with just two criteria because the patient had a renal biopsy with the histological diagnosis: LE-nephritis. One case with four criteria was excluded because the patient has now developed a typical scleroderma. We investigated the fate of each individual case with help from the Statistical Bureau of Iceland. For those dead we investigated the cause of death but we have listed here only the main cause. For instance one patient was listed as having died from generalized peritonitis but as she was then suffering from severe uremia, the latter is listed here as the main cause. Then we contacted all the definite cases stiU alive and also those suspected ones that had a history of positive LE-ceU preparations. From each a blood sample was obtained for HL-A antigen and properdin factor B phenotype deter- minations2). These were carried out by Alfred Arnason Ph. D. & al. in the Blood Bank in Reykjavík. The method used by the HL-A typing is mainly the one described by Terasaki, i. e. two step microcytotoxicity test but with some modifications derived mainly from the method described by Kissmeyer-Nielsen. The method used by the properdin factor B 116
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158

x

Læknablaðið : fylgirit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið : fylgirit
https://timarit.is/publication/991

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.