Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.08.2003, Síða 12

Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.08.2003, Síða 12
■ ABSTRACTS / 27TH NORDIC PSYCHIATRIC CONGRESS soni, Ómar Hjaltasoni, Helgi Jónsson1, Vala G. Guðnadóttir2, Elsa Guðmundsdóttir^, Brynjólfur Ingvarsson^, Andrés Ingason2, Sigmundur Sigfússon^, Hrönn Harðardóttir1, Jeffrey R. Gulcher2, Kári Stefánsson2 • Division of Psychiatry, Landspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík Iceland. 2deCode Genetics, Sturlugötu 8, 101 Reykjavfk, Iceland. ^Department of Psychiatry, Akureyri Hospital, Iceland. Seven schizophrenia susceptibility genes have been reported re- cently. These genes are Neuregulin 1 (NRGl), G72, D-aminoacid oxidase (DAAO), dysbindin (DTNBPl), G-protein signalling-4 (RGS4), proline dehydrogenase (PRODH) and catechol-O- methyltransferase (COMT). Replication studies include the NRGl at risk haplotype being found in excess in Scottish schizophrenia patients as well as in Icelandic patients. In some instances replication studies have found other at-risk haplotypes within the same gene or have failed to find a significant association. NRG 1 promotes neuronal migration and cellular differentiation as well as modulating synaptic plasticity and thus has a clear role in neurodevelopment. NRG 1 is expressed at synapses in the central nervous system and elsewhere. In common with the other genes NRGl has an important role in the expression and activation of neurotransmitter receptors, including glutamate receptors. A behavioural phenotype that overlaps with mouse models for schizophrenia is demonstrated by mutant mice heterozygous for either NRG 1 or its receptor ErbB4. NRGl hypomorphs also have fewer functional NMDA receptors than wild type mice. Abnorma- lities of sensorimotor gating have also been reported with inacti- vated PRODH. With the possible exception of COMT a clear func- tional polymorphism has not been demonstrated. Single SNP's are rarely found to be highly significantly associated with the risk for schizophrenia. Thus associations are presently identified by haplo- types. Although the present findings are promising it is prudent to urge caution and further research to establish unequivocal replications. Attempts at replication may be confounded by the finding of diffe- rent alleles or haplotypes. It is imperative to continue the search for other schizophrenia susceptibility genes. The study of potential endophenotypes as well as the overlap between schizophrenia and bipolar disorders may provide further clues to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and related disorders. Pl - 3 Thursday 14/8,10:00-10:30 Consultation-Liaison (C-L) psychiatry: An update with clinical implications for general psychiatry Ulrik Frcdrik Malt. Professor, Rikshospitalet, Psykosomatisk avdeling, NO-0027 Oslo, Norway u.f.malt@psykiatri. uio. no C-L psychiatry has become a subspecialty within psychiatry in the US, but not in European countries. C-L psychiatry is important for recognition and acceptance of psychiatry among somatic colleagues and in the society as such, but requires knowledge of psychology and medicine in addition to psychiatric experience and clinical wisdom. Psychiatric interventions may improve psychiatric symptoms in the medically ill. Prophylactic intervention may reduce the risk of developing depression in somatic treatments. However, uncritical application of psychotherapy to medically ill patients may worsen the prognosis of the somatic disorder. Nevertheless, C-L research shows that general psychiatrists often recommend psychotherapy for ideo- logical reasons or choose treatment based on personal preference. Ongoing studies show that temporal brain dysfunctions (PET, EEG, qEEG, ERP) may present as regular chronic psychiatric dis- orders (e.g. dysthymia). Psychiatrists may falsely label the patients as “treatment-resistant” or suffering from an “unstable personality disorder” requiring long-term psychotherapeutic treatment. In particular bipolar II disorders may be referred to somatic hospitals with psychosomatic complaints only (e.g. functional dyspepsia, chronic fatigue, “burn-out”). Co-morbid anxiety may preclude correct diagnosis and treatment. Panic disorder may pre- sent as fibromyalgia. Classic conditioning may lead to chronic and functional incapa- citating somatic complaints without somatic findings and lack of ongoing psychosocial conflicts or problems. But classic conditioning may also be used to enhance the effect of somatic treatment (e.g. cancer treatment). The lack of medical knowledge among many psychiatrists may hamper adequate diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders and represent a long-term threat to psychiatry as such. Pl — 4 Friday 15/8, 09:00-9:30 Controversies in the aetiology of schizophrenia Robin M. Murray, Professor of Psychiatry, Box No 63, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF robin.murray@iop.kcl.ac.uk This paper will discuss whether research into schizophrenia has now reached a sufficient level of maturity to allow us to leave behind the ideological debates of the past. A model will be pro- posed which encompasses the importance of both biological and social factors, and integrates factors as disparate as susceptibility genes and social discrimination. Pl - 5 Friday 15/8, 09:30-10:00 The pathogenesis of borderline pathology John Livesley, Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, 2250 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T1W6 The evidence suggests that borderline palhology is influenced by a complex interaction of biological and psychosocial factors. Genetic and environmental factors contributing to the development of borderline personality disorder will be discussed. It will be argued that behavioral-genetic studies suggest that the traits delineating the disorder have a strong heritable component and that the covariation among these traits is influenced by genetic as opposed to environmental factors. Psychosocial factors also exert a powerful influence. Multiple forms of adversity seem to increase the risk of developing borderline personality disorder. None is necessary and sufficient to cause the condition and each form of adversity appears 12 L/EKNABLAÐIÐ / FYLGIRIT 48 2003/89
Síða 1
Síða 2
Síða 3
Síða 4
Síða 5
Síða 6
Síða 7
Síða 8
Síða 9
Síða 10
Síða 11
Síða 12
Síða 13
Síða 14
Síða 15
Síða 16
Síða 17
Síða 18
Síða 19
Síða 20
Síða 21
Síða 22
Síða 23
Síða 24
Síða 25
Síða 26
Síða 27
Síða 28
Síða 29
Síða 30
Síða 31
Síða 32
Síða 33
Síða 34
Síða 35
Síða 36
Síða 37
Síða 38
Síða 39
Síða 40
Síða 41
Síða 42
Síða 43
Síða 44
Síða 45
Síða 46
Síða 47
Síða 48
Síða 49
Síða 50
Síða 51
Síða 52
Síða 53
Síða 54
Síða 55
Síða 56
Síða 57
Síða 58
Síða 59
Síða 60
Síða 61
Síða 62
Síða 63
Síða 64
Síða 65
Síða 66
Síða 67
Síða 68
Síða 69
Síða 70
Síða 71
Síða 72
Síða 73
Síða 74
Síða 75
Síða 76
Síða 77
Síða 78
Síða 79
Síða 80
Síða 81
Síða 82
Síða 83
Síða 84
Síða 85
Síða 86
Síða 87
Síða 88
Síða 89
Síða 90
Síða 91
Síða 92

x

Læknablaðið : fylgirit

Beinleiðis leinki

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið : fylgirit
https://timarit.is/publication/991

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.