Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.08.2003, Qupperneq 68

Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.08.2003, Qupperneq 68
I POSTERS / 27TH NORDIC PSYCHIATRIC CONGRESS Background: Several studies indicate that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has a beneficial effect on depressive symptoms. Aims: To test antidepressant effects of left DLPFC activation by rTMS. Method: Ten adults with major depression received two rTMS treatment periods of 5 days each. During one treatment period the patients received rTMS over the left DLPFC and in the other treat- ment period a placebo stimulation. Tlie order of treatment periods was randomly allocated. Four weeks washout time elapsed between treatment periods. The patients were evaluated with Flamilton De- pression Rating Scale (HDRS) before and after each treatment period by two psychiatrists blind to the nature of the treatment. Event-Related-Potentials (ERP) using oddball paradigm were re- corded before and after each treatment period. Kesults: Changes in depressive symptoms following left DLPFC stimulalion did not show significant difference compared with placebo stimulation. There was an increase in P300 amplitude following left DLPFC stimulation compared with placebo (p = .044). Conclusions: Our findings do not support findings that rTMS over the left DLPFC has antidepressant effects in depressive illness as evaluated by HDRS. P - 31 Thursday 14/8, 14:00-15:00 Paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation shows increased cortical inhibition in major depression Anna L Þórisdóltir1, Ómar Hjaltason2, Ómar ívarsson2, Sigurjón B. StefánssonL ■ Departmcnt of Neurology and ^Department of Psychiatry, Landspitali University Hospital, Iceland annaltho@landspitali. is Background: It is possible to use Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to probe different cortical inhibitory mechanisms. Pro- longed cortical silent period (CSP) has been reported in patients with depressive illness following single pulse stimulation suggesting increased cortical inhibition. Ainis: To test cortical inhibition in depression by single and paired pulse TMS. Method: Ten patients with major depression and 7 control subjects were stimulated with a single pulse. All controls and 3 patients had paired pulse stimulation of equal intensity with 100 ms inter stimulus interval. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) from voluntary activated abductor pollicis brevis muscle were recorded. The first pulse evoked a conditioned MEP and the second pulse evoked a test MEP. Results: The duration of CSP was similar in both groups (p = .36). Mean amplitude of the test MEP was 63 % of the condilioned MEP for controls but 18 % for the 3 patients tested. The latency of the test MEP was increased both in controls and patients. Conclusions: Reduced MEP following the test stimulus suggests an increased cortical inhibition in depressed patient, but this did not affect the duration of the CSP. P - 32 Thursday 14/8,14:00-15:00 Backward visual masking and TMS-induced visual suppression H. Magnús Haraldsson. MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53719. Fabio Ferrarelli MD, Ned H. Kalin MD, Giulio Tononi MD, PhD. hm. haraldsson@hosp. wisc. edu Background: In backward visual masking (BVM), the perception of a visual stimulus is reduced by a subsequently presented mask. Ab- normalities in BVM are well established in schizophrenia. Visual perception can also be suppressed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimu- lation (TMS) of visual cortex, possibly through similar mechanisms. Aims: In preparation for a study of TMS-induced visual suppres- sion in schizophrenics, we examined BVM and TMS-induced sup- pression in healthy subjects. Methods: Sixteen subjects were presented with visual stimuli (let- ters) at one of 4 screen locations. Tlie stimuli were followed, at dif- ferent inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs), either by a second visual sti- mulus (mask), or by a single TMS pulses over right occipital cortex. Results: As expected, B VM was strong at ISIs < 40 milliseconds (ms) but performance returned to over 90% of normal at ISI = lOOms. TMS-induced visual suppression was strongest at ISIs between 65 and 95 ms. At those ISIs, error rate was 42-52% for stimuli presen- ted in the left visual field vs. 10-18% in the right visual field. Condusions: In normal subjects, right occipital TMS induces left visual field suppression with a well-defined peak at 65-95ms. Further studies will investigate whether schizophrenic subjects are abnor- mally sensitive to TMS-suppression as they are to BVM. Educational Objectives: At the conclusion of this presentation, the participant should be able to recognize backward visual masking and visual cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as tools for investigating visual processing. We introduce the application of TMS induced visual suppression for studying populations with impaired early visual processing, such as schizophrenia patients. References I. Amassian VE, Cracco RQ, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in study of the visual pathway. J Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 15: 288-304. 2. McClure RK. The visual backward masking deficit in schizophrenia. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol & Biol Psychiat 2001; 25: 301-11. P - 33 Thursday 14/8,14:00-15:00 Mental disorders in a danish working population Anelia Larsen, Research Fellow, Cand Psych, Unit for Psychiatric Research, Aal- borg Psychiatric Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Mölleparkvej 10, 9000 Aal- borg, Denmark. Henrik Böggild, Jens T. Mortensen, Povl Munk-Jprgensen. A PL@psyk. nja. dk Background: Studies have shown that 20-35% of the working popula- tion experience stress and approx. 10% minor, usually mixed, anxiety and depression. Screening for psychiatric morbidity often shows methodological weakness. Therefore, there is a deficit in knowledge of prevalence of mental problems in working populations. Aims: To estimate the prevalence of psychiatric morbidity within the working population in Denmark. Mcthod: A cross-sectional mullicentre study utilizing a two-phase design was carried out in two counties in Denmark in February 68 LÆKNABLAÐIÐ / FYLGIRIT 48 2003/89
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92

x

Læknablaðið : fylgirit

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið : fylgirit
https://timarit.is/publication/991

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.