The Botany of Iceland - 01.12.1941, Side 8

192
M. P. CHRISTIANSEN
TABLE I
Mean temperature (C°) and precipitation (mm).
April May June July August
Tcmp. Precip. Temp. Precip. Temp. Precip. Temp. Precip. Temp. Precip.
1935 3.1 10.3 9 3 18.1 9.7 31.6 10.7 74.2 10.9 90.1
c3 £ 1937 5.0 60.4 6.9 66.7 9.6 28.2 11.6 51.1 10.4 128.0
<U p4 Normal I 2.4 6.0 9.2 10.9 10.3
'J2 rX 1935 2.1 20.8 9.4 22.2 9.9 45.2 11.0 157.3 10.7 119.8
c3 rO Sh OJ 1937 4.9 110.1 6.6 120.2 9.3 46.6 11.3 129.0 10.1 182.8
W Normal 2.3 6.0 9.5 11.2 10.4
r* 1935 0.3 15.8 8.1 16.0 8.7 63.5 11.1 105.9 10.0 74.9
> cJ "2 1937 3.2 24.3 5.7 48.8 9.4 20.4 10.2 31.5 10.8 64.4
K Normal 0.0 ■3.4 8.1 9.1 8.3
U Vo CtJ -4-> / (Q s 1935 -4-2:9 6.7 4.3 5.9 26.7 9.0 67.2 8.2 49.1
1937 1.5 25.7 3.7 10.9 7.6 31.1 9.6 27.3 8.5 16.9
0 Normal -4-2.0 2.2 7.3 9.0 7.0
“Veðráttan” had 44 p.c. more precipitation, and July even 108 p.c.
more than the normal. In July all stations had I/2 to 2/2 times the
normal precipitation. These facts afford a likely explanation of the
early and rich fungus flora in 1935.
Of the fungus flora later on, in the year 1937, I am not able to
give any information. Nor can I state what time of the year the real
fungus-season is. The literature gives no information on this subject.
According to Poul Larsen, Fungi of Iceland, which
includes all the previous occurrences of fungi in the country, the north-
eastern and northern parts of Iceland seem to be much richer in larger
fungi than south-western and southern Iceland. But this, I am sure, is
not right. At the beginning of August 1935, for instance, I visited
Laugarvatn in the south-west country and here investigated the fungus
flora on a mountain slope covered with underwood (I had only a few
hours at my disposal). I found a greater number of species of the larger
fungi than I had found in other parts of the country (cp. list of fungi