Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1978, Page 20

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1978, Page 20
28 Faroese Bird-Name Origins be that its origin is to be sought in Viking-Age Norway. At once, however, one is faced with an apparent dilemma, since the godwit is hardly a Norwegian bird and hence not likely to have had a traditional Norwegian name. It seems to us, however, that philology has here something to contribute to ornithology. If the godwit is rare in Norway today, that was evidently not so in the past — our linguistic material implies as much. In other words, the absence of a descendant of ON jaðrakárn in the land of its origin is seen to be due to the fact that the species it designated so much declined there that its very name was forgotten. Our material contains more evidence of ornithological inte- rest, again implying that godwit populations have been any- thing but stable. We have already spoken of the godwit as an uncommon species in the Faroes today, and M. á Ryggi, Fugla- bókin, 42, writes that the bird ‘er ikki ofta at síggja í Før- oyum, og sera sjáldan hevur hann reiSrast’. It was not well known two hundred years ago either, to judge from Svabo, Indberetninger, 15: Jearakona (rallus aqvaticus) sees i Flokke. Hvad Tid af Aaret den her opholder sig, er mig ubekjendt. En eneste Flok lykkedes det mig at see paa Sandøen mod Midten af Septembr. 1781. As Rischel and Skarup, loc. cit., point out, the definition rallus, i. e. ‘water rail’, is erroneous, the description ‘sees i Flokke’ making it certain that Svabo had the godwit in mind. But the godwit will not always have been such an elusive bird in the Faroes; on the contrary, it must once have been a quite common sight. We recall the two idioms (above) alluding to the conspicuously long legs. Such expressions could not have arisen had not the godwit at some time been a familiar species. Koparsnípa ‘godwit’ In FBN, 77, we (erroneously) stated that the godwit was without a native name and observed that koparsnípa, adopted from Dan. kobbersneppe, had been used to denote the species in question before M. á Ryggi introduced the neologism reyð-
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.