Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.05.1978, Side 132

Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.05.1978, Side 132
Vinterberg H. , Donde R. , Andersen R.B. , Kommunehospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. By means of a newly developed apparatus that gives an electric impulse, wbich cannot be felt, we have given TNS to patients with R.A. , and by using a double blind cross-over design, we have found significant pain relief. Transcutaneous electro-stimulation has already been used for many years on an empirical basis as an alternative to pharmacological and surgical therapy. But not until 1965, when Melzac and Wall proposed their "spinal gate control theory", did we get a developed theoretical, though still partly hypothetical, explanation of the clinically observed pain relief. Briefly, gate control theory holds that the pain impulse that goes to the spinal medulla via thin C- and A-delta-fibers, is impeded at the synapses in the dorsal column when the thick, non - pain conducting, myelinized A-fibers are stimulated simultaneously. In this way the pain impulse is hindered from reaching the higher levels of the central nervous system. Increased activity in the thick fibers thus tends to "close the gate" for pain impulses. It should therefore be poss- ible to reduce pain by means of selective stimulation of the thick myelinized fibers, which have a threshold for electro-stimulation that is significantly lower than that of the thin fibers. In the past ten years several clinical studies have been conducted based on Gate control theory. Two studies from 1974 should be men- tioned. Shealy and Maurer published a study on 750 patients with acute- or chronic pain. In patients with acute pain 807o achieved excellent control of pain. In those with chronic pain, 297o found TNS so satisfactory that it sufficed as the only treatment, and another 6Ö7o obtained partial pain relief. TRANSCU TANEOUS NERVE STIM- ULATION (TNS) ON PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOED ARTHRITIS (R.A.) A DOUBLE BLIND CROSS-OVER TRIAL In Augustinssons study of 73 consecutive patients ít was found that 337o achieved complete pain relief and 19% partial relief. These and all other studies known to us have in their methology been open studies. The applied electro-stimulation could be felt by the patients. Recently came on the market a Danish developed stimulator "Perator", which gives a modulated, high-frequency electric impulse which cannot be felt. A controlled investigation of double blind cross-over design is then possible. The purpose of our study has been to find out if this apparatus can provide pain relief. This is a preliminary study carried out on a group of patients with a well defined joint disease accompanied by chronic pain. We have not found any comparative studies in the literature. The subjects consisted of 14 consecutive patients with R.A. , 11 women and 3 men between the ages of 45 and 74, the average age being 60. Only patients with both wrist-joints involved were included. All patients were classified according to the criteria of the American Rheumatism Association and assessed clinically using Lansbury’s index. Fig. 1 shows the classifications and length of sickness in months. As seropositive were considered patients with Waaler-Rose-titers of 40 or more and/or RA Latex-fixation-titers of 32 or over. Method. The study was blind for both patients and investigators. It was carried out on a double blind cross-over design in the following manner: On the first day, after randomizing, one half of the patients received active treatment while the other half received placebo treatment with the same set-up, but without any generator SYGDOMSVARIGHED LANSBURY' GENNEMSNIT I MDR.INDEX 8 CLASSICAL 127 mdr. 79 12 SEROPOS. ANTAL .14 4 DEFINITE (6-24o) (8-97) 2 SERONEG. 1 CLASSICAL 1 DEFINITE l8o mdr. (l8o) 73 (57-88) 130
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158

x

Læknablaðið : fylgirit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið : fylgirit
https://timarit.is/publication/991

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.