Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.05.1978, Page 132

Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.05.1978, Page 132
Vinterberg H. , Donde R. , Andersen R.B. , Kommunehospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. By means of a newly developed apparatus that gives an electric impulse, wbich cannot be felt, we have given TNS to patients with R.A. , and by using a double blind cross-over design, we have found significant pain relief. Transcutaneous electro-stimulation has already been used for many years on an empirical basis as an alternative to pharmacological and surgical therapy. But not until 1965, when Melzac and Wall proposed their "spinal gate control theory", did we get a developed theoretical, though still partly hypothetical, explanation of the clinically observed pain relief. Briefly, gate control theory holds that the pain impulse that goes to the spinal medulla via thin C- and A-delta-fibers, is impeded at the synapses in the dorsal column when the thick, non - pain conducting, myelinized A-fibers are stimulated simultaneously. In this way the pain impulse is hindered from reaching the higher levels of the central nervous system. Increased activity in the thick fibers thus tends to "close the gate" for pain impulses. It should therefore be poss- ible to reduce pain by means of selective stimulation of the thick myelinized fibers, which have a threshold for electro-stimulation that is significantly lower than that of the thin fibers. In the past ten years several clinical studies have been conducted based on Gate control theory. Two studies from 1974 should be men- tioned. Shealy and Maurer published a study on 750 patients with acute- or chronic pain. In patients with acute pain 807o achieved excellent control of pain. In those with chronic pain, 297o found TNS so satisfactory that it sufficed as the only treatment, and another 6Ö7o obtained partial pain relief. TRANSCU TANEOUS NERVE STIM- ULATION (TNS) ON PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOED ARTHRITIS (R.A.) A DOUBLE BLIND CROSS-OVER TRIAL In Augustinssons study of 73 consecutive patients ít was found that 337o achieved complete pain relief and 19% partial relief. These and all other studies known to us have in their methology been open studies. The applied electro-stimulation could be felt by the patients. Recently came on the market a Danish developed stimulator "Perator", which gives a modulated, high-frequency electric impulse which cannot be felt. A controlled investigation of double blind cross-over design is then possible. The purpose of our study has been to find out if this apparatus can provide pain relief. This is a preliminary study carried out on a group of patients with a well defined joint disease accompanied by chronic pain. We have not found any comparative studies in the literature. The subjects consisted of 14 consecutive patients with R.A. , 11 women and 3 men between the ages of 45 and 74, the average age being 60. Only patients with both wrist-joints involved were included. All patients were classified according to the criteria of the American Rheumatism Association and assessed clinically using Lansbury’s index. Fig. 1 shows the classifications and length of sickness in months. As seropositive were considered patients with Waaler-Rose-titers of 40 or more and/or RA Latex-fixation-titers of 32 or over. Method. The study was blind for both patients and investigators. It was carried out on a double blind cross-over design in the following manner: On the first day, after randomizing, one half of the patients received active treatment while the other half received placebo treatment with the same set-up, but without any generator SYGDOMSVARIGHED LANSBURY' GENNEMSNIT I MDR.INDEX 8 CLASSICAL 127 mdr. 79 12 SEROPOS. ANTAL .14 4 DEFINITE (6-24o) (8-97) 2 SERONEG. 1 CLASSICAL 1 DEFINITE l8o mdr. (l8o) 73 (57-88) 130
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158

x

Læknablaðið : fylgirit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Læknablaðið : fylgirit
https://timarit.is/publication/991

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.