Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1953, Page 18

Jökull - 01.12.1953, Page 18
Fig. 7. The south-western most part of the Gríms- vötn depression on 28 Aug. 1950. Suðvestcisti hluti Grims- vatnalœgðarinnar séður úr lofti 28. ágúst 1950. Aerial photograph by S. Þórarinsson. July 1953 or in 27 nronths the water level in Grímsvötn has risen ab. 48 m (possible error hardly more than +_ 5 m), and so has also the ice surface in the SW part of the depression. According to Sigurðsson’s map of 1942, the area of the Grímsvötn depression at 1410 m level would be nearly 40 km2 and ab. 26 km2 at the 1360 m level. Thus the established raising of the water level in 27 months means an increase in volume of water and ice in the depression amounting to ab. 1.6 km3. A great part of this increase seems to be due to the increase in volume of water in the depression. The volume increase of 1.6 km3 in nearly 27 months corresponds to an annual increase of ab .0.7 km3, a figure near to the one we found to be the average annual precipitation within the Grímsvötn intake area. In a previous paper (Thorarinsson, 1953) I have expressed the opinion that the mechanism of the Grímsvötn glacier bursts is most easily understood by comparing it with the cata- strophic drainage of ice-dammed lakes such as Grænalón, where melt-water accumulates until the water behind the ice barrier has risen so high (roughly nine tenths of the height of the barrier) that it can raise the barrier and force its way underneath so that the lake drains catastrophically. During the last two centuries the average interval between the glaci- er bursts from Grímsvötn has been ab. 10 years, and before 1938 the intervals were strikingly regular (glacier bursts in 1934, 1922, 1913, 1903, 1897, 1892, 1883, 1873, 1861, and so on). This regularity is, in my opinion, most plausibly ex- plained by assuming that 10 years ablation and subglacial melting within the Grímsvötn intake area is capable of filling the depression with enough water to raise the damming ice barrier. Furthermore, we may assume that during the last centuries the accumulation in the Gríms- vötn intake area has roughly balanced the drain- age from the Grímsvötn depression as other- wise this depression would either have been fill- ed or emptied. The conclusion is that the total discharge of a Skeiðarárhlaup (i. e. glacier burst from Grímsvötn) during the last centuries has on average been 7.0 to 7.5 km3 Graphs of the drainage discharge pattern of the normal Skeið- arárhlaup (Thorarinsson 1953, Figs. 9 and 10) show, that a total discharge of 7.0 to 7.5 km3 cor- responds to a maximum discharge of ab 50.000 m3/sec, which seems to be a plausible figure. The question then arises: When may we ex- pect the next Skeiðarárhlaup? This question is difficult to answer. The Grímsvötn problem is far from definitely solved yet. We do not know with certainty the depth and volume of the de- pression nor do we know to what extent it is occupied by ice. We do not know exactly the 16

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.