Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1982, Page 92

Jökull - 01.12.1982, Page 92
STABLE ISOTOPES IN THE GEOTHERMAL WATER In Figs. 5a and b are shown the 8 D and 8 18 values measured in the geothennal waters in the Eyjafjördur region. A few of the 8 D values used are from Arnason (1976), but the rest is measured in the same samples as analysed in the present study. A total of some 40 8 D values is used in this presen- tation. 8 18 is measured in about 85 samples allow- ing much more detailed interpretation of the results than of the 8 D. The 8 D against 8 18 is shown in Fig. 6. A „best-fit“ line for the points falls near the meteoric line (Dansgaard 1964) and is displaced as compared to the best-fit line for precipitation in Iceland (Amason 1976). Points plotting between those two lines are considered to have resonable values not affected by water-rockreaction. The dis- tinct displacement towards line a (Fig. 6) might be due to a high age of the water also supported by the very low values. In view of the sparingly yield of the springs and the slow recharge in the production areas this is not unlikely. The mean 8 D for the regions is -5- 99 ± 4 %o in springs and drillholes. The only waters which de- viate significantly from this range are from the springs in Hólsgerdi and Ytri-Strjúgsá. The water in the Ytri-Strjúgsá spring can have derived its 8 D from dilution of the same geothermal water with local ground-water which has 8 D about -t- 86 %o (Arnason 1976). The Hólsgerdi water has definitely a diflerent origin than water in other springs in the region. 8 18 in the springs in northern part of Eyja- fjördur is -5- 13.3 ± 0.6 %o and -i- 13.3 ± 0.5 in samples from springs and drillholes. In southem part of the region 8 18 is -r 13.3 ± 0.7 %o. Samples fromEast of the river Eyjafjardará give 8 18 = -r- 13.2 ± 0.5 %o and -h 13.5 ± 0.4 %o West of the river. Only water from the Hólsgerdi and Ytri- Strjúgsá fall significantly out of the range of those means values. The measured 8 18 in two cold springs from the area was -t- 11.65 %o and -r 12.6 %o in the river Eyjafjardará. The Ytri-Strjúgsá sample thus could be a mixture of local ground- water and water of the same 8 18 as the geothermal water feeding the northern part of the region where- as the Hólsgerdi water must havean origin different from the main reservoir. Precipitation with such isotopic composition falls nowhere in Iceland at present. Reaction with rocks would not result in water enriched in the lighter isotopes. The most likely explanation is thus that the water is older than ten thousand years (see Arnason 1976). The much more numerous measurements of8 18 than 8 D permits as mentioned previously a more detailed interpretation. The mean 8 18 values from the Ytri-Tjarnir and Laugaland areas Fa.ll within the range of the mean value for the region. When separate samples are compared significant differ- ences in 8 18 values between those two areas app- ear and by depth in the Laugaland area. Separate aquifers were sampled in the drillholes both while they were still free-flowing (in 1977) and after the waterlevel had been lowered by pumping (in 1979). Several samples from well heads were analysed both of free flowing and pumped water sampled from 1977 to 1981. The results from those analysis are shown in Fig. 7. In the free flowing wells there is found a difference of about -s- 1 in the 8 18 in waters from the main aquifers in Laugaland drillholes on one side and Ytri-Tjarnir and a drillhole (poorly productive) at Grísará just north of Botn. Water from the deepest aq uifer on Laugaland has the same value ot ð 18 as the two other areas mentioned. Aquifers between this lowest one and the main producing zone have values in between. Samples taken in the deepest drillhole after the water level had been lowered by pumping have intermediate 8 18 values, indicating circulation within the drill- hole and little inflow. The samples of free flowing Fig. 6. 8 D against 8 18 for geothermal water in Eyjafjördur. Line a represents the meteoric line (Dansgárd 1964). Line b represents the “best-fit” line for precipitation in Iceland (Arnason 1976). Mynd 6. Tvívetnishlutfall (8 D) á móti súrefnisísotópa- hlutfalli (8 18) í jarðhitavatni í Eyjafirði. Lína a er tengilína fyrir regnvatn á norðurhveli jarðar og lína b er tengilína fyrir regnvatn á Islandi. 88 JÖKULL 32. ÁR
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.