Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.01.2017, Qupperneq 53

Jökull - 01.01.2017, Qupperneq 53
Leó Kristjánsson and Jónsson al. (1988), and one of these has been radiometri- cally dated as being of early Brunhes age. Two other southwest-trending negative lineations may be dis- cerned south of the peninsula, but they are faint; the field in the wider offshore area is fairly uniform, as would for instance be the case over thick sediments. Small-size lows seen within or close to some of the major positive anomalies appear to be caused by shallow structures. One such possibility is hyalo- clastite hills buried in lava flows. Examples have also been recorded where high-temperature chemical pro- cesses have destroyed most of the magnetite in basalts (cf. Námaskarð data in Fig. 3 of Kristjánsson and Watkins, 1977). Geological and ground-level mag- netic studies at these spots are needed to ascertain the origin of these localized lows. It also cannot be ex- cluded that some of these and other minor features in the anomaly pattern may be due to artifacts which went undetected during the surveys. Negative residual fields, already seen in Sig- urgeirsson’s (1970b) map, dominate over most of the north coast of the Reykjanes peninsula. It is inter- esting that some volcanically inactive fissured areas as shown for instance in Fig. 3 of Jakobsson et al. (1978) do not seem to influence the magnetic pat- tern. Around Reykjavík and farther northeast the neg- ative anomalies, with steep lows in the Kollafjörður inlet discovered in a 1993 survey (Jónsson and Krist- jánsson, 2002), are clearly caused by thick series of Matuyama age rocks. This lineation is pierced by the strong positive Stardalur anomaly. The nature of the sources of many of the magnetic anomalies shown in Figure 3 hence remains rather un- certain. However, it is hoped that this map will aid in future deciphering of the unique volcanic, tectonic and geothermal situation of the Reykjanes peninsula, and its history. Acknowledgements Stefán Sæmundsson and Úlfar Henningsson owned and piloted the airplanes used in our magnetic sur- veys. The late Marteinn Sverrisson of the Science Institute was a key person in the 1985–1986 survey. Comments by Páll Einarsson, Kristján Sæmundsson and editor Bryndís Brandsdóttir helped to greatly im- prove the paper. Rósa Ólafsdóttir re-drafted Figure 1 and Ásta Rut Hjartardóttir made the map in Figure 3, using data from Clifton and Kattenhorn (2006) and the National Land Survey of Iceland. NÝTT KORT AF SEGULSVIÐI YFIR REYKJA- NESSKAGA Þorbjörn Sigurgeirsson mældi styrk jarðsegulsviðs- ins á nokkrum fluglínum yfir Reykjanesskaga 1965, og yfir öllu Suðvesturlandi í um 900 m hæð 1968. Segulsviðið reyndist tiltölulega sterkt víða á suður- og miðhluta skagans, en veikt yfir norðurhlutanum. Orsakir hinna jákvæðu frávika frá styrk megin- jarðsegulsviðsins virtust samkvæmt reiknilíkönum liggja djúpt í jörðu, sem kom heim við mælingar á seguleiginleikum bergsvarfs úr borholum niður fyrir 1.5 km dýpi. Á áttunda áratugnum var bent á, að hinum fjölmörgu bergsprungum og misgengjum á nesinu mátti skipta upp í fáeina nokkuð afmarkaða SW-NE „sveima“. Þeir hafa verið skilgreindir á tals- vert mismunandi hátt af ýmsum fræðimönnum undan- farna áratugi, en eru ljóslega að hluta tengdir bæði ný- legri eldvirkni, þekktum háhitasvæðum, og jákvæðu segulsviðsfrávikunum. Frekari segulsviðsmælingar á Faxaflóa og suður fyrir Reykjanesskaga fóru fram 1973, 1985–1986 og 1991–1992. Hefur nú verið unn- ið úr þeim nýtt marglita kort af segulsviði yfir skagan- um og næsta umhverfi hans. Mest áberandi í kortinu eru aflöng segulsviðsfrávik sem skarast að nokkru við eldvirka hluta sprungusveimanna. REFERENCES Buck, W. R., P. Einarsson and B. Brandsdóttir 2006. Tec- tonic stress and magma chamber size as controls on dike propagation: constraints from the 1975–1984 Krafla rifting episode. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B12404, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003879. Clifton, A. E. and S. A. Kattenhorn 2006. Structural archi- tecture of a highly oblique divergent plate boundary segment. Tectonophysics 419, 27–40. Hall, J. M. 1985. The Iceland Research Drilling Project crustal section: variation of magnetic properties with depth in Icelandic-type oceanic crust. Can. J. Earth Sci. 22, 85–111. Heirtzler, J. R., X. LePichon and J. G. Barron 1966. Mag- netic anomalies over the Reykjanes Ridge. Deep-Sea Res. 13, 427–443. 48 JÖKULL No. 67, 2017
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.