Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2006, Page 81

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2006, Page 81
SAMLEIKAGERÐ í NÝTSLUMENTANINl HJÁ BØRNUM 79 tures of consumption such as teachers and parents/guardians were interviewed. These adults represent important informants be- cause of their knowledge of the children being studied. The study was carried out in central Scot- land in two small towns where children were relatively restricted in their access to large retail outlets. Sunny Nursery5 (hereafterSN) is a privately owned nursery with children from mixed backgrounds (government vouchers6 were accepted by the nursery). Northern Primary School7 (hereafter NPS) with its 320 pupils, is located in a relatively deprived area in a small town. Waterside Pri- maiy school (hereafter WPS) has 220 pupils and is situated in a slightly smaller, but much rnore affluent village. However, both schools have a comparable distance to the large city. When comparing census data and the “Carstairs Deprivation Categories” (McLoone, 2000) with fieldwork data it was clear that the two areas represent children with relatively different socioeconomic backgrounds. The nursery on the other hand, represented children from mixed socioeco- nomic backgrounds - although it skewed slightly towards affluence. Power issues in research with children There are profound implications of the adult-child power barriers for the construc- tion of researcher role in the field and these have been extensively debated in the child- hood studies literature (e.g. Corsaro and Rizzo, 1988; Fine and Sandstrom, 1988; Graue and Walsh, 1998; James et. ai, 2001; Thorne, 1993). To understand the world through children’s eyes requires adults to substantially reduce the asymmetrical power relationship - something which can only be achieved through careful consideration of the role the researcher adopts whilst in the field. Adultist, supervisory and teacher-like roles, which have so often been adopted in research with children in the past, do little to reduce the social distance between adults and children. Furthermore, such roles are in- compatible with the philosophy of child- hood studies (Fine and Sandstrom, 1988). Rather a friend role was adopted where the researcher entered the setting and distanced herself froin the authoritarian status which adults have vis-á-vis children - to the ex- tent that it is possible for an adult. Thus the researcher did everything the children did, from sitting with them at their desks to eat- ing lunch with them. Over time the chil- dren’s trust was gained and consequently; they spoke openly and frankly with the re- searcher, providing important insights into their worlds. Whilst conducting fieldwork the most valuable moments of insight into children’s cultures of consumption were those away from the interference of adults. Therefore, time spent e.g. in the playground during break, eating lunch with the children and going on fieldtrips proved to be excellent opportunities for gathering data. To witness these accounts and have a valid presence during these moments the researcher played with the children, spoke with them and tried to be their friend. Methods The main methods used throughout the year-
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.