Læknablaðið

Árgangur

Læknablaðið - 15.02.1985, Blaðsíða 52

Læknablaðið - 15.02.1985, Blaðsíða 52
34 LÆKNABLAÐID met for all. This is in line with the United Nations General Assembly resolution A/RES/34/58, which calls upon the relevant bodies of the United Nations system to coordinate with and support by appropriate actions within their respective spheres of competence the efforts of the World Health Organization in reaching the goal of health for all. If this inter- dependence is not recognized, both at national and international levels, efforts to improve health will be at once more costly and less effective. Above all, it is only with the firm commitment of both governments and the people that the action needed within Member States and the required collaboration between them can be strengthened sufficiently for the targets in the European Region to be reached. 1.1. A EUROPE FREE FROM THE FEAR OF WAR War is the most serious of all threats to health. The devastation that a war would entail in terms of persons killed, wounded and permanently disabled simply defies imagination. The dropping of a one-megaton atom bomb over a large city would kill more than 1.5 million people and injure as many. It has been estimated that a »limited« nuclear war, with smaller tactical nuclear weapons delivering a total of 20 megatons on military targets in a relatively densely populated area, would exact a toll of about 9 million dead and seriously injured, while a full-scale war exploding 10 000 megatons of nuclear bombs would kill 1 150 000 000 people and injure 1 100 000 000, so that more than half the world’s population would be immediate victims. The impact of such an event on the world environment would be immense. However, it must not be forgotten that conventional war is also a terrible threat to humanity. The immense devastation of the Second World War is only a small indication of what could result from a major inter- national armed conflict today given the more destruc- tive »conventional« weapons now available. However, peace is not just the absence of war. It is also a positive sense of wellbeing and security for people of all countries, implying the opportunity to freely determine their own destiny and fully exploit their human potential. It assumes the possibility of all nations actively participating on a basis of equality and in a true spirit of solidarity and reciprocity in the development of a more satisfying world for all people. An important point in this regard is that in Europe, at the present time, it is not war itself that presents health problems, but the fear of war. The increasing inter- national tension in recent years has raised this level of apprehension to a point which severely hampers the opportunities for all peoples in the Region to work together in harmony for a better future. All these elements contributed to the recent decision of the General Assembly of the United Nations to adopt a resolution which stresses once again the urgent need for the international community to make every effort to remove the growing threat of war. There are some things that the health sector can do that fit in with its basic role and that can help to reduce international tension. In each country, thehealth sector should take the lead in promoting close, long-term collaboration on health problems across national borders. The bilateral and international research, meetings and contacts involved, in addition to im- proving health, will increase understanding and forge links between individuals, institutions and countries, thus serving to reduce international tension and demon- strating the value of mutual cooperation. Moreover, each national health sector should take responsibility for creating a better understanding of what a war, and particularly a nuclear war, would really mean for health, and thus strengthen the motivation for peace. By analysing objectively the extent of human destruction, suffering and disability which a war would entail in their country, by giving a realistic analysis of how little its health services would be able to do to treat the civilian and military casualties, and by making these facts known and understood by politicians and the general public, the health sector could help to encou- rage significantly a more active search for ways of preventing war from ever breaking out again. At the international level, the World Health Organization has taken the initiative in this respect with the adoption by the World Health Assembly at the later distribution of the report concerning »Effects of nuclear war on health and health services«. Such efforts should be continued. 1.2. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL In the commitment of the Member States of the European Region to health for all by the year 2000 lies a fundamental principle of social policy: all human beings have an equal right to health. That right will be ensured by providing all the people of the Region with an equal opportunity to develop health to the full and maintain it. This principle has two aspects in the European Region: equity among nations and equity among the people within each country. Very large inequalities at present exist among the countries of the Region. TheEuropean Region includes countries which have widely different standards of living. Gross national product per head in 1980 varied from about US $700 in one Member State to over US $12 000 in another. Expectation of life at birth varied among Member States from 55 years to 77 years. In some richer countries, there is a surplus of hospital beds and trained health personnel, while in some of the poorest the basic health infrastructure is still not complete. These sharp contrasts in health status and health services are reflected in the differences in the degree of poverty among the various countries of the Region and within the individual countries, the richer nations being in no way exempt from the overall problem of social inequity. There are similar variations in other respects, such as sanitation, water supply, housing and the availability of basic commodities. As is shown in detail in Chapter 2, these differences in socioeconomic development also translate into di- sturbing inequalities in health status. A key problem in the less privileged countries of the Region is the lack of funds for investment in the health sector. A major challenge for the European Region is, therefore, how to bring about a more concrete policy of solidarity through which the more fortunate countries can collaborate more effectively with the less fortunate ones to ensure development of the health sector. This is in line with the »Charter of Economic Rights and Duties
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60

x

Læknablaðið

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Læknablaðið
https://timarit.is/publication/986

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.