Læknablaðið - 15.11.1996, Page 48

794
LÆKNABLAÐIÐ 1996; 82
studies. lst ed. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1984;
93-4, 190.
15. Thomas JE, Lambert EH, Cseuz KA. Electrodiagnostic
aspects of the carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Neurol
1967; 16: 635-41.
16. Loong SC. The carpal tunnel syndrome: a clinical and
electrophysiological study in 250 patients. Ciin Exp Neu-
rol 1977; 14: 51-65.
17. Kimura I, Ayyar DR. The carpal tunnel syndrome: elec-
trophysiological aspects of 639 symptomatic extremities.
Electromyography 1985; 25: 151-64.
18. Melvin JL, Schuchmann JA, Lanese RR. Diagnostic
specificity of motor and sensory nerve conduction var-
iables in the carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil 1973; 54: 69-74.
19. Johnson RK, Shrewsbury MM. Anatomical course of
the thenar branch of the median nerve: usually in a
separate tunnel through the tranverse carpal ligament. J
Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52-A: 269-73.
20. Joynt RL. Correlation studies of velocity, amplitude,
and duration in median nerves. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
1989; 70: 477-81.
21. Shivde AJ, Dreizin I, Fisher MA. The carpal tunnel
syndrome. A clinical- electrodiagnostic analysis. Elec-
tromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 21: 143-53.
22. Buchthal F, Rosenfalck A. Sensory conduction from
digit to palm and from palm to wrist in carpal tunnel
syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1971; 34: 243-
52.
23. Anderson MH, Fullerton PM, Gilliatt RW, Hern JEC.
Changes in the forearm associated with median nerve
compression at the wrist in the guinea-pig. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 1970; 33: 70-9.
24. Ming-Hong C, Kwong-Kum L, Shih-Ping C, Koon-Wah
K, See Chiu C. Proximal slowing in carpal tunnel syn-
drome resulting from either conduction block or retro-
grade degeneration. J Neurol 1993; 240: 287-90.
25. Behse F, Buchthal F. Sensory action potential and biop-
sy of the sural nerve in neuropathy. Brain 1978; 101:
473-93.
26. Thomas PK, Fullerton PK. Nerve fibre size in the carpal
tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1963;
26: 520-7.
27. Kemble F. Clinical manifestations related to electrophy-
siological measurements in the carpal tunnel syndrome.
Electromyography 1968; 8: 19-26.
28. Sunderland S. The nerve lesion in the carpal tunnel
syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1976; 39: 615-
26.
29. Asbury AK, Fields HL. Pain due to perirheral nerve
damage: an hypothesis. Neurology 1984; 23: 1587-90.
30. Torebjörk HE, Hallin RG. Perceptua! changes accom-
panying controlled preferential blocking of A and C
fibre. Responses in intact human skin nerves. Exp Brain
Res 1973; 16: 321-32.
31. AAEM quality assurance commitee: Jablecki CK, An-
dary CMT, So YT, Wilkins DE, Williams FH. Litera-
ture review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies
and electromyography for the evaluation of patients
with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle & Nerve 1993; 16:
1392-414.