Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1967, Síða 59

Jökull - 01.12.1967, Síða 59
tions at Stórisjór ancl Langisjór discussed above. As already stated in chapter 2, mountains and valleys in the Tungnaá area have a NE—SW lineament. The water divide between Tungnaá and Skaftá lies along the Tungnaárfjöll moun- tains, which disappear under glacier against Tungnaárbotnar, cf. Fig. 1. As a continuation of them the mountain Sydri-Kerling rises north- west of Tungnaárjökull. Very likely Tungnaár- fjöll are continuous co Sydri-Kerling below the glacier. Thus, the Tungnaárjökull was formed as the Vatnajökull ice cap had increased to such a degree that an outlet glacier discharged over Tungnaárfjöll turning Tungnaá into a glacier-fed river. But when this happened can- not be stated with accuracy. From A. Magnús- son’s description dating from shortly after 1700 it appears that Tungnaá had by then become glacier-fed, but the sediments in Stórisjór in- dicate that this had not yet occurred in 1362. At a certain time in this interval Vatnjökull has overflowed the Tungnaárfjöll. The loess layers in the hut ruins at Stórisjór indicate that the huts were abandonned about or just before 1600, probably as a result of the contamination of the lake water by glacier water. As far as we know two attempts have been made at reconstructing climate into the past. One was made by thc meteorologist P. Berg- thórsson (Bergthórsson 1967). For this purpose he makes use of records on sea ice and years of famine in Iceland and finds their correla- tion to temperature. His reconstruction reaches back to the colonization of Iceland in the 9th century. The other attempt was made by an English meteorologist H.H. Lamb (Lamb 1966). He bases liis reconstruction on various sources of information such as history and natural sciences. Lamb’s attempt reaches far behincl the settlement period of Iceland, even back to the Ice Age. Bergthórsson and Lamb are in good agreement as to the changes in climate. Both reach the conclusion that the period from about 870 up to the year 1200 had a compara- tively warm climate. During the following two centuries the climate was colder, then came a short mild period from just before 1400 to about 1450, when it began to grow colder again approaching the cold climatic period. About 1600 a marked decrease in temperature occurr- ed. The cold climatic period then lastecl up to the last turn of a cenlury witli only short inter- vals of warmer climate. In connection with these variations in climate it is of interest to note the oscillations in size and volume of glaciers. The investigations of Stórisjór indicate that there are strong prob- abilities as to Vatnajökull liaving overflowed the Tungnaárfjiill mountains as the climate began to deteriorate markedly about 1600. Tungnaárjökull seems to have reached its maximum size shortly before 1890. The glacier at Langisjór, the Skaftárjökull is somewhat different from Tungnaárjökull since it creeps along a valley whereas Tungnaárjökull creeps right across a mountain ridge. Skaftárjökull seems to reach its maximum advance about 1890. The authors have estimated the pre-1600 position and thickness of Skaftárjökull to the east of the Tungnaárfjöll. In this connection Tungnaárfjöll are considered to continue in a minimum elevation of 800—900 m to the Kerl- ingar mountains. For the estimation of the in- crease in thickness of glaciers, use lias been made of Nye’s formula (Matheivs 1967), which is adapted to a level l'loor and therefore fits fairly well to the relevant conditions. l'he for- mula is: li sin a =----, K wliere a = the slope of tlie ice surface, h = the thickness of the ice and T h =-------= constant ~ 10. Og (t shear stress per unit area; e mean density of ice; g the acceleration of gravity). According to Nye’s formula a glacier with its margin lying in 700—750 m elevation east of Tungnaárfjöll due east of Jökulheimar would have been in 1100 m elevation at Kerlingar. The same result is obtained by using for com- parison the slope of the flat outlet glaciers of Vatnajökull as it is shown on maps. It can hardly have been higher at Kerlingar without overflowing Tungnaárfjöll. From this premise the advance of the glaciers from 1600 to 1890 can be supposed to have been as follows: JÖKULL 17. ÁR 293
Síða 1
Síða 2
Síða 3
Síða 4
Síða 5
Síða 6
Síða 7
Síða 8
Síða 9
Síða 10
Síða 11
Síða 12
Síða 13
Síða 14
Síða 15
Síða 16
Síða 17
Síða 18
Síða 19
Síða 20
Síða 21
Síða 22
Síða 23
Síða 24
Síða 25
Síða 26
Síða 27
Síða 28
Síða 29
Síða 30
Síða 31
Síða 32
Síða 33
Síða 34
Síða 35
Síða 36
Síða 37
Síða 38
Síða 39
Síða 40
Síða 41
Síða 42
Síða 43
Síða 44
Síða 45
Síða 46
Síða 47
Síða 48
Síða 49
Síða 50
Síða 51
Síða 52
Síða 53
Síða 54
Síða 55
Síða 56
Síða 57
Síða 58
Síða 59
Síða 60
Síða 61
Síða 62
Síða 63
Síða 64
Síða 65
Síða 66
Síða 67
Síða 68
Síða 69
Síða 70
Síða 71
Síða 72
Síða 73
Síða 74
Síða 75
Síða 76
Síða 77
Síða 78
Síða 79
Síða 80
Síða 81
Síða 82
Síða 83
Síða 84
Síða 85
Síða 86
Síða 87
Síða 88
Síða 89
Síða 90
Síða 91
Síða 92
Síða 93
Síða 94
Síða 95
Síða 96
Síða 97
Síða 98
Síða 99
Síða 100
Síða 101
Síða 102
Síða 103
Síða 104
Síða 105
Síða 106

x

Jökull

Beinleiðis leinki

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.