Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.12.1967, Qupperneq 59

Jökull - 01.12.1967, Qupperneq 59
tions at Stórisjór ancl Langisjór discussed above. As already stated in chapter 2, mountains and valleys in the Tungnaá area have a NE—SW lineament. The water divide between Tungnaá and Skaftá lies along the Tungnaárfjöll moun- tains, which disappear under glacier against Tungnaárbotnar, cf. Fig. 1. As a continuation of them the mountain Sydri-Kerling rises north- west of Tungnaárjökull. Very likely Tungnaár- fjöll are continuous co Sydri-Kerling below the glacier. Thus, the Tungnaárjökull was formed as the Vatnajökull ice cap had increased to such a degree that an outlet glacier discharged over Tungnaárfjöll turning Tungnaá into a glacier-fed river. But when this happened can- not be stated with accuracy. From A. Magnús- son’s description dating from shortly after 1700 it appears that Tungnaá had by then become glacier-fed, but the sediments in Stórisjór in- dicate that this had not yet occurred in 1362. At a certain time in this interval Vatnjökull has overflowed the Tungnaárfjöll. The loess layers in the hut ruins at Stórisjór indicate that the huts were abandonned about or just before 1600, probably as a result of the contamination of the lake water by glacier water. As far as we know two attempts have been made at reconstructing climate into the past. One was made by thc meteorologist P. Berg- thórsson (Bergthórsson 1967). For this purpose he makes use of records on sea ice and years of famine in Iceland and finds their correla- tion to temperature. His reconstruction reaches back to the colonization of Iceland in the 9th century. The other attempt was made by an English meteorologist H.H. Lamb (Lamb 1966). He bases liis reconstruction on various sources of information such as history and natural sciences. Lamb’s attempt reaches far behincl the settlement period of Iceland, even back to the Ice Age. Bergthórsson and Lamb are in good agreement as to the changes in climate. Both reach the conclusion that the period from about 870 up to the year 1200 had a compara- tively warm climate. During the following two centuries the climate was colder, then came a short mild period from just before 1400 to about 1450, when it began to grow colder again approaching the cold climatic period. About 1600 a marked decrease in temperature occurr- ed. The cold climatic period then lastecl up to the last turn of a cenlury witli only short inter- vals of warmer climate. In connection with these variations in climate it is of interest to note the oscillations in size and volume of glaciers. The investigations of Stórisjór indicate that there are strong prob- abilities as to Vatnajökull liaving overflowed the Tungnaárfjiill mountains as the climate began to deteriorate markedly about 1600. Tungnaárjökull seems to have reached its maximum size shortly before 1890. The glacier at Langisjór, the Skaftárjökull is somewhat different from Tungnaárjökull since it creeps along a valley whereas Tungnaárjökull creeps right across a mountain ridge. Skaftárjökull seems to reach its maximum advance about 1890. The authors have estimated the pre-1600 position and thickness of Skaftárjökull to the east of the Tungnaárfjöll. In this connection Tungnaárfjöll are considered to continue in a minimum elevation of 800—900 m to the Kerl- ingar mountains. For the estimation of the in- crease in thickness of glaciers, use lias been made of Nye’s formula (Matheivs 1967), which is adapted to a level l'loor and therefore fits fairly well to the relevant conditions. l'he for- mula is: li sin a =----, K wliere a = the slope of tlie ice surface, h = the thickness of the ice and T h =-------= constant ~ 10. Og (t shear stress per unit area; e mean density of ice; g the acceleration of gravity). According to Nye’s formula a glacier with its margin lying in 700—750 m elevation east of Tungnaárfjöll due east of Jökulheimar would have been in 1100 m elevation at Kerlingar. The same result is obtained by using for com- parison the slope of the flat outlet glaciers of Vatnajökull as it is shown on maps. It can hardly have been higher at Kerlingar without overflowing Tungnaárfjöll. From this premise the advance of the glaciers from 1600 to 1890 can be supposed to have been as follows: JÖKULL 17. ÁR 293
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.