Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.2003, Side 21

Jökull - 01.12.2003, Side 21
The 1783–1785 Laki-Grímsvötn eruptions east of Mt. Kaldbakur as either Landnorðursgjá (the northeast vents) or Austurgjá (the east vents). The fires at the third eldgjá were seen at least 10 times from July 1783 to May 1785 (Steingríms- son, 1788). These fires were situated east-northeast of Kirkjubæjarklaustur according to observers and re- ferred to as Austur-Landnorðursgjá (the east north- east vents). The actual location of this site has been debated in the past, because no historical eruption sites are known due east-northeast of Prestbakki or Kirkjubæjarklaustur (Thoroddsen, 1925; Thorarins- son, 1974; Thordarson and Self, 1988). However, the following quotations taken from Steingrímsson’s de- scriptions give a clear indication on the location of this eldgjá: 26 September 1783: “Another additional fire and steam column, which had been seen before that summer, far east- northeast of the Síða district, due north of Lómagnúpur mountain, but north-northwest of Öræfi district, as it was oriented by me and 8 others.” January 1784: “Fires were still seen at the East- northeast f issure. From Klaustur [i.e., Kirkjubæjarklaust- ur], these fires were seen behind the northern end of Þverár- fjall mountain. The inhabitants of Öræfi district had a better view of these fires due to their location.” Firstly, these descriptions show that this eldgjá (i.e., eruption site) was separated from the other two by a considerable distance to the east. Secondly, de- spite the fact that Steingrímsson says the fires were east-northeast of Kirkjubæjarklaustur, his directional information indicates otherwise. The fires were seen behind the northern end of Þverárfjall, showing that they were actually located to the north-northeast (20– 30◦) of Kirkjubæjarklaustur (Figure 4). The only way these fires could be observed from the vicinity of Lómagnúpur Mountain was through the valley of the River Núpsvötn, which is located along the east- ern side of the mountain. This valley trends 3◦ east of north. The third orientation given by Steingríms- son is from the Öræfi district east of Skeiðarársan- dur, where the fires were seen to the north-northwest. When these three cardinal references are plotted, it is clear that the Austur-Landnorðursgjá eruption site was at the Grímsvötn volcano (Figure 4). COURSE OF EVENTS AS REVEALED BY THE CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTS THE PRECURSORS OF THE ERUPTION A farmer, Jón Eiríksson at Ljótarstaðir in the Skaft- ártunga district observed the first sign of activity in the area when he felt weak tremors in mid-May 1783. These tremors largely went unnoticed until 29 May when they increased to such an extent that the inhab- itants in Skaftártunga district evacuated their homes and slept outside in tents for their own safety. On 1 June strong earthquakes were felt over an area extend- ing from Mýrdalur in the west to Öræfi in the east, to a distance of about 75km from the Laki fissures. The intensity and duration of these earthquakes steadily increased through the first week of June or until the onset of the eruption on 8 June (A1–3). Signs indicating volcanic activity were seen in the mountains or in the glaciers above the Fire districts in the spring 1783 before the onset of the Laki eruption. The crew of a brig claimed that they saw fires some- where above the Fire districts, as well as southwest of the Reykjanes peninsula, as they were passing the southern coast of Iceland on their way to Hafnarfjörð- ur in SW-Iceland (Figure 1, inset). It is not known whether this brig was the Boesand, which arrived at the beginning of May or the Torsken, which arrived around 20 May. It was also reported that the inhab- itants of the Fire districts often saw a bluish smoke above the ground, which they related to volcanic ac- tivity (B1). The location of the above-mentioned activity is unknown, but may have been within the Vatnajökull ice cap because the inhabitants of the Fire districts did not specify the location of the site. In summary: The Laki eruption was preceded by 3–4 weeks of seismic activity. It began with weak earth- quakes in mid-May 1783 that increased in intensity and frequency until the beginning of the eruption on 8 June. If the observation by the brig’s crew is correct, this precursory phase may have resulted in a short- lived eruption sometime in May 1783. FIRST 45 DAYS OF THE ERUPTION In clear and calm weather on Whitsunday, 8 June 1783, at about 9 a.m., people in the Fire districts JÖKULL No. 53, 2003 19

x

Jökull

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.