Fróðskaparrit - 01.07.2004, Side 81

Fróðskaparrit - 01.07.2004, Side 81
KYKSILVUR í LIVUR, EGGUM OG FJØÐUR CEPPHUS GRYLLE FAEROENSISIN THE FAROE ISLANDS 79 The mercury concentration in the two feather samples (from the back and under one wing) was not significantly different (at P=0,05) in the two locations Hestoy and Sveipur (Mann-Whitney U-test) and thus the two samples may be seen as a unity. Also liver samples from the birds whose feather mercury concentration was deter- mined were analysed for mercury. Thus a comparison of feather mercury concentra- tion to that of the liver is possible (Fig. 4). In the plot, the data series from the two sites Sveipur and Hestoy are shown separately regardless of the fact that there, as already mentioned, were no significant differences in the feather mercury concentrations at these two locations. The samples from Sveipur consist of liver and feather from 4 adult females and 3 juvenile males, where- as the Hestoy sample is composed of tissue from 3 adult males (hereof one outlier Cg0058) and five juveniles of both sexes. The four Hestoy samples whose feather mercury concentration is elevated in com- parison to the inserted regression line for the Sveipur material (Fig. 4) are juveniles. The outlier Cg0058, an adult male, in the Hestoy batch had a feather mercury con- centration of 21,9 mg/kg and a liver mer- cury concentration of 3,77 mg/kg (Olsen et al., 2003). The overall mean feather and liver mer- cury concentrations were 4,72 mg/kg and 1,11 mg/kg respectively, thus with a ratio between them of 4,2. A standard value for this ratio of feather to liver mercury con- centration of 2,3 (fresh weight) has been suggested (Appelquist etal., 1985; Thomp- son et al., 1990). However, the validity of this ratio has been questioned (Thompson et ai, 1990). Given the fact that mercury is excreted from the liver (Stickel et al., 1977) but once deposited in the feather is no longer bioactive, it is plausible that such a ratio may only be valid if all parameters in- fluencing the mercury concentration are constant. Eggs Mercury concentration in black guillemot eggs is given in Tab 1 along with data on the fractionation of stable isotopes of nitro- gen and carbon in these (Olsen et al., 2003; Ólafsdóttir, 2002). Judging from this data there appears to be a trend of decreasing mercury concentration at both locations of egg sampling, going from a mean 0,46 mg/kg mercury at the two sites in 1999 to 0,33 mg/kg in 2001. This decrease is equiv- alent to a relative decrease of almost 30% from 1999 to 2001, and represents quite a substantial change. At the same time there is a gradual increase in 615N, going from an approx. average of 10 %c at the two lo- cations in 1999 to approx. 12 %c in 2001, that is an increase of 18% since 1999. This increase corresponds to roughly a Vi trophi- cal level elevation and could have been ex- pected to be accompanied by an increase in mercury concentration, but this expected increase is not found. On the contrary a de- crease is seen. In addition to the observed decrease in egg mercury concentration, there is a parallel decrease also in PCB (Hoydal et al., 2003). This is seen as an in- dication that the reason for the decrease may be that the birds have a decreasing in- take of “typical” mercury and PCB carriers,
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.