Fróðskaparrit - 01.07.2004, Qupperneq 81

Fróðskaparrit - 01.07.2004, Qupperneq 81
KYKSILVUR í LIVUR, EGGUM OG FJØÐUR CEPPHUS GRYLLE FAEROENSISIN THE FAROE ISLANDS 79 The mercury concentration in the two feather samples (from the back and under one wing) was not significantly different (at P=0,05) in the two locations Hestoy and Sveipur (Mann-Whitney U-test) and thus the two samples may be seen as a unity. Also liver samples from the birds whose feather mercury concentration was deter- mined were analysed for mercury. Thus a comparison of feather mercury concentra- tion to that of the liver is possible (Fig. 4). In the plot, the data series from the two sites Sveipur and Hestoy are shown separately regardless of the fact that there, as already mentioned, were no significant differences in the feather mercury concentrations at these two locations. The samples from Sveipur consist of liver and feather from 4 adult females and 3 juvenile males, where- as the Hestoy sample is composed of tissue from 3 adult males (hereof one outlier Cg0058) and five juveniles of both sexes. The four Hestoy samples whose feather mercury concentration is elevated in com- parison to the inserted regression line for the Sveipur material (Fig. 4) are juveniles. The outlier Cg0058, an adult male, in the Hestoy batch had a feather mercury con- centration of 21,9 mg/kg and a liver mer- cury concentration of 3,77 mg/kg (Olsen et al., 2003). The overall mean feather and liver mer- cury concentrations were 4,72 mg/kg and 1,11 mg/kg respectively, thus with a ratio between them of 4,2. A standard value for this ratio of feather to liver mercury con- centration of 2,3 (fresh weight) has been suggested (Appelquist etal., 1985; Thomp- son et al., 1990). However, the validity of this ratio has been questioned (Thompson et ai, 1990). Given the fact that mercury is excreted from the liver (Stickel et al., 1977) but once deposited in the feather is no longer bioactive, it is plausible that such a ratio may only be valid if all parameters in- fluencing the mercury concentration are constant. Eggs Mercury concentration in black guillemot eggs is given in Tab 1 along with data on the fractionation of stable isotopes of nitro- gen and carbon in these (Olsen et al., 2003; Ólafsdóttir, 2002). Judging from this data there appears to be a trend of decreasing mercury concentration at both locations of egg sampling, going from a mean 0,46 mg/kg mercury at the two sites in 1999 to 0,33 mg/kg in 2001. This decrease is equiv- alent to a relative decrease of almost 30% from 1999 to 2001, and represents quite a substantial change. At the same time there is a gradual increase in 615N, going from an approx. average of 10 %c at the two lo- cations in 1999 to approx. 12 %c in 2001, that is an increase of 18% since 1999. This increase corresponds to roughly a Vi trophi- cal level elevation and could have been ex- pected to be accompanied by an increase in mercury concentration, but this expected increase is not found. On the contrary a de- crease is seen. In addition to the observed decrease in egg mercury concentration, there is a parallel decrease also in PCB (Hoydal et al., 2003). This is seen as an in- dication that the reason for the decrease may be that the birds have a decreasing in- take of “typical” mercury and PCB carriers,
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.