Fróðskaparrit - 01.07.2004, Page 81

Fróðskaparrit - 01.07.2004, Page 81
KYKSILVUR í LIVUR, EGGUM OG FJØÐUR CEPPHUS GRYLLE FAEROENSISIN THE FAROE ISLANDS 79 The mercury concentration in the two feather samples (from the back and under one wing) was not significantly different (at P=0,05) in the two locations Hestoy and Sveipur (Mann-Whitney U-test) and thus the two samples may be seen as a unity. Also liver samples from the birds whose feather mercury concentration was deter- mined were analysed for mercury. Thus a comparison of feather mercury concentra- tion to that of the liver is possible (Fig. 4). In the plot, the data series from the two sites Sveipur and Hestoy are shown separately regardless of the fact that there, as already mentioned, were no significant differences in the feather mercury concentrations at these two locations. The samples from Sveipur consist of liver and feather from 4 adult females and 3 juvenile males, where- as the Hestoy sample is composed of tissue from 3 adult males (hereof one outlier Cg0058) and five juveniles of both sexes. The four Hestoy samples whose feather mercury concentration is elevated in com- parison to the inserted regression line for the Sveipur material (Fig. 4) are juveniles. The outlier Cg0058, an adult male, in the Hestoy batch had a feather mercury con- centration of 21,9 mg/kg and a liver mer- cury concentration of 3,77 mg/kg (Olsen et al., 2003). The overall mean feather and liver mer- cury concentrations were 4,72 mg/kg and 1,11 mg/kg respectively, thus with a ratio between them of 4,2. A standard value for this ratio of feather to liver mercury con- centration of 2,3 (fresh weight) has been suggested (Appelquist etal., 1985; Thomp- son et al., 1990). However, the validity of this ratio has been questioned (Thompson et ai, 1990). Given the fact that mercury is excreted from the liver (Stickel et al., 1977) but once deposited in the feather is no longer bioactive, it is plausible that such a ratio may only be valid if all parameters in- fluencing the mercury concentration are constant. Eggs Mercury concentration in black guillemot eggs is given in Tab 1 along with data on the fractionation of stable isotopes of nitro- gen and carbon in these (Olsen et al., 2003; Ólafsdóttir, 2002). Judging from this data there appears to be a trend of decreasing mercury concentration at both locations of egg sampling, going from a mean 0,46 mg/kg mercury at the two sites in 1999 to 0,33 mg/kg in 2001. This decrease is equiv- alent to a relative decrease of almost 30% from 1999 to 2001, and represents quite a substantial change. At the same time there is a gradual increase in 615N, going from an approx. average of 10 %c at the two lo- cations in 1999 to approx. 12 %c in 2001, that is an increase of 18% since 1999. This increase corresponds to roughly a Vi trophi- cal level elevation and could have been ex- pected to be accompanied by an increase in mercury concentration, but this expected increase is not found. On the contrary a de- crease is seen. In addition to the observed decrease in egg mercury concentration, there is a parallel decrease also in PCB (Hoydal et al., 2003). This is seen as an in- dication that the reason for the decrease may be that the birds have a decreasing in- take of “typical” mercury and PCB carriers,
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.