Fróðskaparrit - 01.07.2004, Side 91

Fróðskaparrit - 01.07.2004, Side 91
KYKSILVUR í FØROYUM - EIN GJØGNUMGONGD AV TØKUM DÁTUM 89 Also, and very interestingly, a significant increase in the deposition of gaseous mer- cury in the samplers with increasing station elevation above sea level was observed, an observation which would also be predicted from the cold condensation mechanism which have been suggested as important pathways for the transport of POPs and mercury to the Arctic (Mackay et al., 1995; Wania and Mackay, 1995). Recently, Christensen (2003) simulated the air transport of mercury, sulphur and lead to the Faroe Islands. The simulations were based on the Danish Hemispheric Eulerian Model system developed at NERI (Christensen 1997; 1999). There were 13 mercury species in the DEHM, of which 3 in gas phase (Hg°, HgO and HgCl2), 9 species in the aqueous phase, and one species of particulate mercury. As input data to the model were used the 1995 glob- al inventory on mercury (Pacyna and Pacy- na, 2002) which includes Hg°, reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) and particulate mercury and a background concentration of 1,5 ng/m3 of Hg° were used as initial con- centration and boundary conditions. The model is capable of incorporating the polar- sunrise driven mercury depletion into the composite transport and deposition predic- tion. The model which was run for the peri- od October 1998 to December 2000, pre- dicted that the polar sunrise event will re- sult in a modest 8% increase in the mercury deposition on the Faroe Islands where the increase in the total area north of the polar circle amounts to more that 100 %. The model also predicted that mercury emitted as particles will be a minor part (2%) of the mercury deposited in the Faroes whereas the atmospheric reservoir of elemental mercury, Hg°, is the main contribution (more than 93%) to the total deposition, a reservoir which is global and which com- bines both natural and anthropogenic mer- cury. It was also calculated that the total de- position would amount to approx. half the deposition of mercury in Denmark. The model have been compared with measurements many places in Europe and generally there have been very good agree- ment between the calculated results and the measured ones. For the Faroes however, there was a poor agreement between the calculated values and the observed concen- tration of gaseous mercury Hg° (Chris- tensen, 2003; Skov et al., 2003), and the model results for lead and SOx were not compared to measured ones. The reason for the lack of agreement between the model values of mercury deposition to those actu- ally measured were later accounted to mal- functioning of the mercury analyser in the high humidity environment of the Faroe Is- lands (Skov, personal comm.). Precipitation As mentioned in the last section, an EMEP station run by NERI was operative at Akraberg in the period 1979 to 1991. At this station acid rain components and para- meters were analysed in deposition, and for the last four years also the major cations sodium, potassium, magnesium and calci- um was included in the analyses scheme (Kemp 1984; 1993; 1994). This scheme did not encompass mercury, neither do the analyses performed by the Heilsufrøðiliga
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.