Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Side 26

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Side 26
24 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 5. árgangur 2008 were to a large extent based on expectancy-value theory and self-efficacy theory, putting the focus on students’ expectations and their valuing of schooling and learning, perceptions of ability, perceptions of studying different subjects, and perceptions of themselves as learners. This theoretical framework also guided the development of the questionnaires for parents as well as questions concerning social background factors. A research assistant interviewed students in grade one and filled out a questionnaire based on their responses. In the other grades, the questionnaires were administered by the research team. The population of students and parents in this study was 1310 for each group (parents 1310 and students 1310). The response rate was 76.5% for students and 81.4% for parents. Findings The findings suggest that the motivational level of students is variable between grades 1, 3, 6 and 9. Students in grade 1 were highly motivated towards schooling; 75% said they enjoyed learning. The majority of students in grade 3 were also very motivated, but the ratio of students who claimed to be very motivated had declined down to 62%. The findings also indicate that there was a group of students (5–10%) in grades 1 and 3 that was not very motivated towards learning. The majority of these students were boys. In the higher grades, the students’ motivation continued to decrease. In grade 6, close to half or 48% of the students stated that they enjoyed schooling, but in grade 9 the percentage dropped to only 41%. These findings were reinforced by the views of parents. The difference in motivation of boys and girls grew with increased age. Motivation in grades 6 and 9 towards studying different subject areas was relatively high, but variable between subjects. For example, 55% of students in grade 6 said that they were very or somewhat interested in studying Icelandic language and literature, 66% foreign languages, 47% mathematics, 68% arts, and 84% crafts. However, in grade 9, the motivation to study these subjects decreased, especially for arts and crafts. Mathematics was the only subject where the motivational level stayed the same. Generally, the motivational level of girls was higher than boys for the different subject areas. Discussion The motivational level of students in grades 6 and 9 was lower than in grades 1 and 3. The motivation level for most students in grades 1 and 3 was quite high. However, the lack of motivation of 5–10% of these students is of great concern, particularly for boys who make up the majority of these children. This disinterest in the beginning of schooling will likely create problems of all kinds with increased age. Further research is needed for a deeper understanding of the nature of this lack of motivation. Generally, the motivational level of boys was lower than that of girls in all the grades and this difference increased with age. This trend needs to be further researched and suggests that teaching methods and elements in the learning environment (school and home) of boys and girls need special attention. The motivational level towards studying different subject areas was clearly variable. Students in grade 6 showed high motivation towards studying arts and crafts, but in grade nine this interest had dropped considerably. The motivational level towards academic subjects was generally lower than in arts and crafts in grade 6. The difference in motivation for academic subjects between grades 6 and 9 did not drop as extensively as for arts and crafts. One can speculate whether this variable interest in these subject areas reflects the value society puts on them. Amalía Björnsdóttir, Baldur Kristjánsson og Börkur Hansen
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.