Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1976, Side 16

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1976, Side 16
24 Seismic Refraction Measurements around the Faeroe Islands and observations at F6 of line A have been omitted from the analysis so far. The trouble is that signals from A1 ... A7 are late at F6, later than expected from other stations and arrivals from line C (north). A speculative explanation could be that there is an area of lower velocities to the west of the islands between F6 and line A. The boundaries of the gravity high to the south of the Faeroe Islands are close to LOMFS(A) and C36 according to the map (fig. 2). Signals from this area are very weak or absent on the islands but the ship station LOMFS(A) gives a well defined apparent velocity of 6.60 km/s. The stations on the islands, except F6, have either no arrivals in this region or Moho- arrivals, and MIR(B) south of the gravity high gives only two weak arrivals from the region. This means that an inter- pretation must rely on LOMFS(A) from which only travel times and distances are available. However, the assumption of a basement with a velocity of 6.60 km/s below the gravity high and with time terms of about 2/s s gives a satisfying fit. The only remaining refractor seems to be Moho. The Moho- arrivals from line A are reversed by use of observations from Iceland and the Faeroe Islands, and a time term analysis using DU5 (Iceland) and a station occupied by.Soviet ship »Lomono- sov« in the middle of line A gave the true velocity 7.79 + 0.10 km/s and time terms close to 2.5 s for line A (Bott et al. 1976). A time term analysis of all Moho arrivals at the Faeroese stations gave a true velocity of 7.61 + 0-22 km/s (Casten & Nielsen 1975). A number of time term analyses has been made using NASP- data from Scotland (IGSl), Shetland (UKAEA, DUl) and Iceland (DU5) together with Faeroese data, and the velocities were found to vary between 7.8 and 8.3 km/s, with lower values for line A and higher values for line B. Except for line A the fit of the time term models is, however, rather poor, probably because lateral inhomogeneities of the crust make the time terms dependent on the directions; this explains possibly the low value 7.61 km/s found previously for the Faeroe Block itself.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.