Læknablaðið

Árgangur

Læknablaðið - 15.03.1984, Blaðsíða 41

Læknablaðið - 15.03.1984, Blaðsíða 41
LÆKNABLADID 70,107-117,1984 107 Brian A. Worthington THE CLINICAL POTENTIAL OF NMRIMAGING SUMMARY Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a new non invasive method of studying the internal structure of the body which completely avoids the use of ionizing radiation and appears to be unassociated with any adverse effects. The principles underlying the technique are ex- plained and an indication is given of its great versatility in studying pathology by reference to the preliminary findings in a study of over 700 patients. Much work i^now being directed towards both defining the'optimal technique for a given pathological condition which requires a better understanding of the factors controlling tissue contrast, and exploring the specificity of the information which can be derived from the images so as to determine the extent to which precise tissue identifica- tion will be possible. INTRODUCTION Within the electromagnetic spectrum there are several windows available for imaging the body consisting of bands of radiation which can penetrate human tissue. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) imaging utilises radio-fre- quency radiation in the presence of a magne- tic field to produce cross-sectional images of the body which portray the distribution den- sity of hydrogen nuclei and parameters relat- ing to their motion in cellular water and lipids. As with CT, the display of soft tissue detail is at a premium and with NMR there is the added advantage of being able to manipulate the contrast between different tissues in order to highlight pathological changes by altering the pattern of radio-frequency pulses which is applied. In NMR imaging there are no specifi- cally directed photons or specially aligned This article is based on a paper read to the Icelandic Radiological Society on December, 6th, 1982 by professor B. S. Worthington, B.Sc., M.B.B.S., D.M.R.D., F.R.C.R. All enquiries and correspondence should be addressed to: Division of Radiology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Notting- ham, NG7 2UH, England. detectors. Choice of imaging plane is achieved by methods which restrict data collection to the desired region; this means that choice of slice thickness and position can be achieved without patient movement and that the addi- tional perspective of direct sagittal and coro- nal views is possible as well as the more conventional transverse sections (1). This avo- ids the time and radiation dose penalty associ- ated with reformatted projections in compu- ted tomography. NMR has the further advan- tages of being non-invasive; avoiding the use of ionizing radiation; penetrating bone witho- ut significant attenuation and it appears to be without hazard. The phenomenon of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was discovered in 1945 and from it derives the discipline of NMR spectroscopy which is now widely used in the study of matter at the molecular level. Only relatively recently has it been applied as a method for imaging the body, but there has now been progression from a period where work was only carried out on laboratory prototypes to the present widespread installa- tion of commercial machines for clinical evalu- ation (2, 3, 4). PRODUCTION OF THE NMR SIGNAL Almost all of the images to date have been of the nuclear magnetism of the hydrogen nucle- us, or proton, which is a particularly favour- able nucleus from the NMR standpoint becau- se it gives a relatively high signal and it has a high abundance in biological tissues. Protons have associated with them both a spin and a magnetic field and can be regarded as tiny bar magnets spinning about the vertical axis. When placed in a uniform magnetic field this axis is both tilted and caused to rotate with a precessionel movement like a tiny gyroscope. The frequency of this precession is directly proportional to the applied magnetic field and for protons in a field of 0.15 tesla is 6.39 MHz. If a pulse of oscillating radiofrequency (RF)
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64

x

Læknablaðið

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Læknablaðið
https://timarit.is/publication/986

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.