Jökull


Jökull - 01.01.2004, Page 3

Jökull - 01.01.2004, Page 3
Theories on migration and history of the North-Atlantic flora: a review last century, Thoroddsen (1905–1906) introduced the idea that the highest parts of the coastal mountains in Iceland had remained ice-free during the maxi- mum extent of the one major glaciation that he rec- ognized. Nearly three decades later, Lindroth also supported the idea, based on entomological studies in southeast Iceland (Norðdahl, 1991 and references therein). Based on geomorphological evidence, the Icelandic geologist Sigurdur Thorarinsson (1937) ar- gued that large parts of northwest and north Iceland were unglaciated during the last glacial period. Scandinavia The Norwegian geologist Hansen (1904) proposed a theory of a broad ice-free margin along the Norwegian Atlantic coast, where a large number of plant species could have survived the last glacial period. Hansen also believed that he could trace a more or less con- tinuous line of moraines in the fjord-districts of Nor- way, which marked the outer border of the last large ice-sheet along the Norwegian Atlantic coast (Dahl, 1955). Later it was shown that this line marks a cer- tain stage during the deglaciation of Norway and not the outer boundary of the last ice-sheet (Nordhagen, 1963). In 1912, the geologist Vogt claimed that the outermost Norwegian islands of Lofoten, Værö and Röst, had been ice-free during the last glacial pe- riod (Nordhagen, 1963). Although some early geol- ogists believed that ice-free areas existed during the last glacial period, the glacial survival theory also re- ceived strong criticism from several Norwegian and Swedish Quaternary geologists who demanded proof for the existence of ice-free areas. Other geologists did not totally denounce the “refugium theory” but preferred to remain uncommitted (Nordhagen, 1963). A MATURATION OF IDEAS - IS GLACIAL SURVIVAL THE ANSWER? The North Atlantic Biota and their History was the ti- tle of a symposium held at the University of Iceland, Reykjavík in 1962 (Löve and Löve, 1963). Biologists participating in the symposium almost unanimously agreed that the observed distribution of certain Scan- dinavian plant species could not be explained unless they had survived in ice-free refugia at least during the last glacial period. The tabula rasa theory, claiming that all plants immigrated after the last glacial period, had few proponents. Three botanical arguments were primarily for- warded in support of the glacial survival theory: 1. The west-arctic element, 2. The alpine endemic element and 3. The special disjunction of the alpine flora. 1. The West-Arctic Element Dahl (1955) discussed some plant/geographic patterns which were difficult to reconcile with the tabula rasa theory. The west-arctic element is of special interest. This comprises plant species found in Iceland, Scan- dinavia, Greenland and North America (a few occur- ing also in Novaya Zemlya and Svalbard) but miss- ing in the Alps, Ural Mountains, and Asia. Dahl felt it was difficult to explain the west-arctic element in the Scandinavian mountain flora by migration from the south or east after the last glacial age. No similar west-arctic elements have been found in the Alps, but why did these plants not migrate to the Alps if they lived along the margins of the ice in central Europe through the ice age (Dahl, 1955)? As Blytt (1881) and others pointed out, the plant/geographic connections within Greenland, Iceland, Scotland and Scandinavia are so close that direct migration across the Atlantic Ocean was very likely (Dahl, 1955). In Scandinavia, the west-arctic element includes about 30 species. About half of these species are represented in Iceland and about 40% in Spitzber- gen (Dahl, 1955). They show several distinct distri- bution patterns, e.g. species which have their western limits in Greenland (e.g. Arenaria pseudofrigida) and in eastern North America (e.g. Pedicularis flammea). Other species reach as far as the Alaska/Beringia re- gion (e.g. Campanula uniflora) and some have a high arctic distribution, connecting Svalbard with northern Greenland (e.g. Minuartia rossii) (Dahl, 1955, 1998). 2. The Alpine Endemic Element According to Dahl (1955), the glacial survival theory is important to explain endemism in the Scandinavian JÖKULL No. 54 3
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.