Skógræktarritið - 15.10.2020, Page 64

Skógræktarritið - 15.10.2020, Page 64
SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 202064 14. GOST 18486-87. 1988. Lesovodstvo. Terminy i opredel- enia. [ГОСТ 18486-87 Лесоводство. Термины и определения] Izdatelstvo standartov, Moskva. 17 bls. 15. Griess, V. C., Acevedo, R., Härtl, F., Staupendahl, K. & Knoke, T. 2012. Does mixing tree species enhance stand resistance against natural hazards? A case study for spruce. Forest Ecology and Management, 267: 284-296. 16. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press. London. 892 p. ISBN: 1932-846-24-7. 17. Hartley, M.J. 2002. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 155 (1-3): 81-95. 18. Hynynen, J., Repola, J. & Mielikainen, K. 2011. The effects of species mixture on the growth and yield of mid-rotation mixed stands of Scots pine and silver birch. Forest Ecology and Management, 262 (7): 1174-1183. 19. Johansson, T. 1996. Management of birch forest. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, (24): 7-20. 20. Johansson, T. 2003. Mixed stands in Nordic countries - a challenge for the future. Biomass & Bioenergy, 24 (4-5): 365-372. 21. Arnór Snorrason. 2013. Blöndun trjátegunda í skógrækt. Í: Skógarauðlindin: ræktun, umhirða og nýting (Hallur S. Björgvinsson, Björgvin Örn Eggertsson, Björn B. Jónsson & Harpa Dís Harðardóttir ritstj.), bls. 36-39. Hvanneyri: Land- búnaðarháskóli Íslands. 22. Jón Hilmar Kristjánsson. 2020. Áhrif blöndunar trjátegunda og gróðursetningaraðferða á lifun og vöxt 15 ára skógar á Suðurlandi. (M.Sc. ritgerð), Landbúnaðarháskóli Íslands, Hvanneyri. 23. Kelty, M. J. 2006. The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry. Forest Ecology and Management, 233 (2-3): 195-204. 24. Klang, F. & Ekö, P. M. 1999. Tree properties and yield of Picea abies planted in shelterwoods. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 14 (3): 262-269. 25. Kolbeinn Árnason og Ingvar Matthíasson. 2009. CORINE-land- flokkun á Íslandi 2000 og 2006. Landmælingar Íslands, Akranesi. 40 bls. 26. Lavrinenko, D. D. 1965. Vzaimodeistvie drevesnykh porod v razlichnykh tipakh lesa. [Взаимодействие древесных пород в различных типах леса.] Lesnaja promyshlennost. Moskva. 247 bls. 27 Lindén, M. & Agestam, E. 2003. Increment and yield in mixed and monoculture stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies based on an experiment in southern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 18 (2): 155-162. 28. Man, R. Z. & Greenway, K. J. 2013. Effects of soil moisture and species composition on growth and productivity of trembling aspen and white spruce in planted mixtures: 5- year results. New Forests, 44 (1): 23-38. 29. Man, R. Z., Rice, J. A. & MacDonald, G. B. 2010. Five-year light, vegetation, and regeneration dynamics of boreal mixedwoods following silvicultural treatments to establish productive aspen-spruce mixtures in northeastern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere, 40 (8): 1529-1541. 30. Melekhov, I.S. 1980. Lesovedenie [Лесоведение]. Nauka. Moskva, 406 bls. 31. Moghaddam, E. R. 2014. Growth, development and yield in pure and mixed forest stands. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 2 (10): 2725- 2730. 32. Morozov, G.F. 1949. Uchenie o lese [Учение о лесе]. 7.-útg., Goslesbumizdat, Moskva. 455 bls. 33. Nichols, J.D., Bristow, M. & Vanclay, J.K. 2006. Mixed-species plantations: prospects and challenges. Forest Ecology and Management, 233 (2-3): 383-390. 34. Olsthoorn, A. F. M., Bartelink, H. H., Gardiner, J. J., Pretzsch, H., Hekhuis, H. J., & Franc, A. 1999. Management of mixed-species forest: silviculture and economics. IBN scientific contributions; No. 15. Wageningen: IBN-DLO. 35. Pawson, S.M., Brin, A., Brockerhoff, E.G., Lamb, D., Payn, T.W., Paquette, A. & Parrotta, J.A. 2013. Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22 (5): 1203-1227. 36. Peltola, A. (ritstj.) 2014. Metsätilastollinen Vuosikirja 2014. Finnish Forest Research Institute: Vantaa, Finland. fyrir aðstoð við mælingar. Einnig þakkar hann Nordgen fyrir að styrkja kostnað við akstur og úttektir í Gunnarsholti og Framleiðnisjóði landbúnaðarins fyrir að styrkja meistaranámsverkefnið. Höfundar vilja einnig sérstaklega þakka Landgræðslunni fyrir margháttaða veitta aðstoð og aðstöðu við LT-verkefnið í Gunnarsholti. LT-verkefnið er samstarfsverkefni Skógræktarinnar, Landgræðslunnar og Landbúnaðarháskóla Íslands. Heimildaskrá 1. Agestam, E. 2015. Gallring. Skogsskötselserien nr. 7, bls. 91. Skogsstyrelsen. 2. Agestam, E., Karlsson, M., & Nilsson, U. 2006. Mixed forests as a part of sustainable forestry in southern Sweden. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 21 (2-3): 101-117. 3. Ásrún Elmarsdóttir, Bjarni Diðrik Sigurðsson, Edda S. Oddsdóttir, Fjellberg, A., Bjarni E. Guðleifsson, Borgþór Magnússon, Erling Ólafsson, Guðmundur Halldórsson, Guðmundur A. Guðmundsson, Guðríður Gyða Eyjólfsdóttir, Kristinn H. Skarphéðinsson, María Ingimarsdóttir & Ólafur K. Nielsen. 2011. Áhrif skógræktar á tegundaauðgi. Náttúrufræðingurinn, 2: 69–81. 4. Baltodano, J. 2000. Monoculture forestry: a critique from an ecological perspective. In: Tree Trouble: A Compilation of Testimonies on the Negative Impact of Large-scale Monoculture Tree Plantations. Prepared for the 6th COP of the FCCC. Nether- lands, Hague: Friends of the Earth International, p. 10. 5. Beech, E., Rivers, M., Oldfield, S. & Smith, P. P. 2017. GlobalTreeSearch: The first complete global database of tree species and country distributions. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 36 (5): 454-489. 6. Bowyer, J. L. 2006. Forest plantations threatening or saving natural forests? Arborvitae, 31: 8-9. 7. Bravo-Oviedo, A., Pretzsch, H., Ammer, C., Andenmatten, E., Barbati, A., Barreiro, S., Brang, P., Bravo, F., Coll, L., Coronal, P., den Ouden, J., Ducey, M. J., Forrester, D. I., Giergiczny, M., Jacobsen, J. B., Lesinski, J., Loef, M., Mason, B., Metslaid, M., Matovic, B., Morneau, F., Motiejunaite, J., O’Reilly, C., Pach, M., Ponette, Q., del Rio, M., Short, I., Skovsgaard, J.P., Solino, M., Spathelf, P., Sterba, H., Stojanovic, D., Strelcova, K., Svoboda, M., Verheyenn, K., von Lupke, N. & Zlatanov, T. 2014. European Mixed Forests: definition and research perspectives. Forest Systems, 23 (3): 518-533. 8. Bremer, L. L. & Farley, K. A. 2010. Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19 (14): 3893-3915. 9. Dirnberger, G.F. & Sterba, H. 2014. A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands. Forest Systems, 23 (3), 534-546. 10. FAO. 2020. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main report. Rome. 175 bls. 11. Felton, A., Ellingson, L., Andersson, E., Drössler, L. & Blennow, K. 2010. Adapting production forests in southern Sweden to climate change: Constraints and opportunities for risk spreading. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 2 (1): 84-97. 12. Felton, A., Nilsson, U., Sonesson, J., Felton, A. M., Roberge, J. M., Ranius, T. & Drössler, L. 2016. Replacing monocultures with mixed species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden. Ambio, 45 (2): 124-139. 13. Vandermeer, J. H. 1989. The ecology of intercropping. bls. 237. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124

x

Skógræktarritið

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.