Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði - 01.01.2008, Síða 121

Um virkar og frjósamar orðmyndunarreglur í íslensku 119
Gunnlaugur Ingólfsson. 1979. Lítið eitt um lýsingarorð sem enda á -ugur. íslenskt mál
1:43-55.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. Understanding Morphology. Amold, London.
Katamba, Francis. 1993. Morphology. The MacMillan Press, London.
Kristín Bjamadóttir. 1996. Afleiðsla og samsetning í generatífri málfræði og greining
á íslenskum gögnum. Ritgerð til kandídatsprófs í íslenskri málfræði, Háskóla
Islands, Reykjavík.
Mulford, Randa. 1983. On the Acquisition of Derivational Morphology in Icelandic:
Leaming about -ari. íslenskt mál 5:107-127.
Oxford English Dictionary (OED). Rafræn útgáfa á vefnum, vefslóð: www.oed.com.
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Moiphological Productivity: Structural Constraints on English
Derivation. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
KMS = Ritmálsskrá Orðabókar Háskólans.
Sigurður Jónsson. 1984. Af hassistum og kontóristum. íslenskt mál 6:155-167.
Spencer, Andrew. 2003. Ritdómurum Morphological Productivity eftir Laurie Bauer
(2001). Journal of Linguistics 39:391-395.
horsteinn G. Indriðason. 1994. Regluvirkni í orðasafni og utan þess. Um lexíkalska
hljóðkerfisfræði íslensku. Málffæðirannsóknir 9. Málvísindastofnun Háskóla
Islands, Reykjavik.
horsteinn G. Indriðason. 2005. Historisk produktivitet. Nordica Bergensia 32:39-65.
Nordisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen.
SUMMARY
On productive and profitable word-formation mles in Icelandic’
Keyvvords: derivational morphology, word-formation rules, productivity, produc-
tion, competence, performance, blocking effects
ln the literature, productivity of a word-formation rule generally refers to both the
ubility of a speaker to form a new word by using this mle (this ability is then a part
°f the inherent knowledge of the language user) and the production or output of the
tn!6 as measured by the number of words created by it and occurring in speech and
texts. The main purpose of this paper is to differentiate between those two notions by
relating them to key elements in Chomskyan linguistics, namely competence and
Performance. Productivity of a word-formation mle is then seen as a part of the lan-
Suage user’s competence: certain word formation mles are productive in the speak-
er s grammar in the sense that they can be used to form new words. The extent to
which they are actually used by speakers at any given time is a matter of performance.
^he production of a word-formation mle is thus the result of the performance of a
sPcaker (or a number of speakers, rather) and this result can then be found in record-