Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Side 103

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Side 103
101 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 5. árgangur 2008 modern times. About half a century ago the concept of “competence“ was dominant in the discourse about aims in education, referring to explicit objectives, separate skills and measurable performance. The concept of teacher competence was commonly used for listing practical skills of the “good teacher“. Training for the job was the central issue in Iceland as in many other countries (Ingólfur Á. Jóhannesson, 1992; Wolfgang Edelstein, 1988). In the eighties the competence concept gave way to a more holistic view of the work of teachers. However, the emphasis on teacher competence in this narrow meaning has regularly turned up in discussions about the aims of teacher education, and it has been criticized for reducing the teacher role to that of a “technician“ (Korthagen, 2004; van Huizen, 2005). In the late 1980’s the concept of professionalism became dominant in research and discourse about teacher education. Teachers’ thinking and ethical standards became the main issues in the literature about teacher education (Lauvås & Handal, 2000; Schön, 1983), as well as the development of teachers’ professional identities or “practice theories“. Supervision in connection with practice teaching, with emphasis on the teacher students’ reflections about own methods and ethical standards, was considered to be a preferable teaching method, aiming at deeper understanding of the work (Handal & Lauvås, 1983). In recent decades the concept of competence has again become central in educational discussions and the definition has become broader and connected to the concept of learning (Sommer, 1996). The concept has been used about the potential for actions and for defining “learning outcomes“, referring to broad definitions of learning, i.e. changes in social competence and life skills as well as in cognitive and physical competence. According to the new definitions the concept adds something new to the concepts of knowledge and skills. Learning – defined as competence development – means changed possibilities to act: it means being able to use knowledge and skills to do things according to the demands of the situation (Schultz Jørgensen, 1999). Furthermore, competence has motivational effects which knowledge and skills do not in themselves have (Bandura, 1997). With reference to Vygotsky’s concepts, learning involves both internalizing and externalizing knowledge (1978). The competence concept is now connected to the concept of professionalism. Many scholars emphasize the importance of mastering competence in pedagogical thinking, as well as being able to apply their own knowledge and skills at work. In recent years sociocultural theories have been dominant in the literature on teacher education. The importance of involving the interaction between the individual and the world in defining and researching teachers’ professional competence has been highlighted by many scholars, with references to Vygotsky’s theory. Theories about situated learning and “communities of practice“ are central in the literature. To some extent, the mentors’ role and understanding of learning processes seem to harmonize with the theories of situated learning; learning to teach is seen as a process of learning to be, see and respond in increasingly informed ways while working in classrooms (Edwards & Protheroe, 2004; Lave & Wenger, 1991). Teacher education is inevitably influenced by the characteristics of modern societies. Teacher students must, for instance, be prepared for coping with social fragmentation and cultural diversity in all forms (Edwards, Gilroy, & Hartley, 2002). Collective learning methods and “communities of practice“ are seen as the foundation for learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991). In my definition of the concept “teacher competence“ I involve the aspect of personal qualities - or personal competence (Ragnhildur Bjarnadóttir, 2004, 2008a). My definitions are in line with many Nordic researchers, who have argued that teacher competence Markmið kennaranáms
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.