Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Page 103

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Page 103
101 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 5. árgangur 2008 modern times. About half a century ago the concept of “competence“ was dominant in the discourse about aims in education, referring to explicit objectives, separate skills and measurable performance. The concept of teacher competence was commonly used for listing practical skills of the “good teacher“. Training for the job was the central issue in Iceland as in many other countries (Ingólfur Á. Jóhannesson, 1992; Wolfgang Edelstein, 1988). In the eighties the competence concept gave way to a more holistic view of the work of teachers. However, the emphasis on teacher competence in this narrow meaning has regularly turned up in discussions about the aims of teacher education, and it has been criticized for reducing the teacher role to that of a “technician“ (Korthagen, 2004; van Huizen, 2005). In the late 1980’s the concept of professionalism became dominant in research and discourse about teacher education. Teachers’ thinking and ethical standards became the main issues in the literature about teacher education (Lauvås & Handal, 2000; Schön, 1983), as well as the development of teachers’ professional identities or “practice theories“. Supervision in connection with practice teaching, with emphasis on the teacher students’ reflections about own methods and ethical standards, was considered to be a preferable teaching method, aiming at deeper understanding of the work (Handal & Lauvås, 1983). In recent decades the concept of competence has again become central in educational discussions and the definition has become broader and connected to the concept of learning (Sommer, 1996). The concept has been used about the potential for actions and for defining “learning outcomes“, referring to broad definitions of learning, i.e. changes in social competence and life skills as well as in cognitive and physical competence. According to the new definitions the concept adds something new to the concepts of knowledge and skills. Learning – defined as competence development – means changed possibilities to act: it means being able to use knowledge and skills to do things according to the demands of the situation (Schultz Jørgensen, 1999). Furthermore, competence has motivational effects which knowledge and skills do not in themselves have (Bandura, 1997). With reference to Vygotsky’s concepts, learning involves both internalizing and externalizing knowledge (1978). The competence concept is now connected to the concept of professionalism. Many scholars emphasize the importance of mastering competence in pedagogical thinking, as well as being able to apply their own knowledge and skills at work. In recent years sociocultural theories have been dominant in the literature on teacher education. The importance of involving the interaction between the individual and the world in defining and researching teachers’ professional competence has been highlighted by many scholars, with references to Vygotsky’s theory. Theories about situated learning and “communities of practice“ are central in the literature. To some extent, the mentors’ role and understanding of learning processes seem to harmonize with the theories of situated learning; learning to teach is seen as a process of learning to be, see and respond in increasingly informed ways while working in classrooms (Edwards & Protheroe, 2004; Lave & Wenger, 1991). Teacher education is inevitably influenced by the characteristics of modern societies. Teacher students must, for instance, be prepared for coping with social fragmentation and cultural diversity in all forms (Edwards, Gilroy, & Hartley, 2002). Collective learning methods and “communities of practice“ are seen as the foundation for learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991). In my definition of the concept “teacher competence“ I involve the aspect of personal qualities - or personal competence (Ragnhildur Bjarnadóttir, 2004, 2008a). My definitions are in line with many Nordic researchers, who have argued that teacher competence Markmið kennaranáms
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.