Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Síða 103

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Síða 103
101 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 5. árgangur 2008 modern times. About half a century ago the concept of “competence“ was dominant in the discourse about aims in education, referring to explicit objectives, separate skills and measurable performance. The concept of teacher competence was commonly used for listing practical skills of the “good teacher“. Training for the job was the central issue in Iceland as in many other countries (Ingólfur Á. Jóhannesson, 1992; Wolfgang Edelstein, 1988). In the eighties the competence concept gave way to a more holistic view of the work of teachers. However, the emphasis on teacher competence in this narrow meaning has regularly turned up in discussions about the aims of teacher education, and it has been criticized for reducing the teacher role to that of a “technician“ (Korthagen, 2004; van Huizen, 2005). In the late 1980’s the concept of professionalism became dominant in research and discourse about teacher education. Teachers’ thinking and ethical standards became the main issues in the literature about teacher education (Lauvås & Handal, 2000; Schön, 1983), as well as the development of teachers’ professional identities or “practice theories“. Supervision in connection with practice teaching, with emphasis on the teacher students’ reflections about own methods and ethical standards, was considered to be a preferable teaching method, aiming at deeper understanding of the work (Handal & Lauvås, 1983). In recent decades the concept of competence has again become central in educational discussions and the definition has become broader and connected to the concept of learning (Sommer, 1996). The concept has been used about the potential for actions and for defining “learning outcomes“, referring to broad definitions of learning, i.e. changes in social competence and life skills as well as in cognitive and physical competence. According to the new definitions the concept adds something new to the concepts of knowledge and skills. Learning – defined as competence development – means changed possibilities to act: it means being able to use knowledge and skills to do things according to the demands of the situation (Schultz Jørgensen, 1999). Furthermore, competence has motivational effects which knowledge and skills do not in themselves have (Bandura, 1997). With reference to Vygotsky’s concepts, learning involves both internalizing and externalizing knowledge (1978). The competence concept is now connected to the concept of professionalism. Many scholars emphasize the importance of mastering competence in pedagogical thinking, as well as being able to apply their own knowledge and skills at work. In recent years sociocultural theories have been dominant in the literature on teacher education. The importance of involving the interaction between the individual and the world in defining and researching teachers’ professional competence has been highlighted by many scholars, with references to Vygotsky’s theory. Theories about situated learning and “communities of practice“ are central in the literature. To some extent, the mentors’ role and understanding of learning processes seem to harmonize with the theories of situated learning; learning to teach is seen as a process of learning to be, see and respond in increasingly informed ways while working in classrooms (Edwards & Protheroe, 2004; Lave & Wenger, 1991). Teacher education is inevitably influenced by the characteristics of modern societies. Teacher students must, for instance, be prepared for coping with social fragmentation and cultural diversity in all forms (Edwards, Gilroy, & Hartley, 2002). Collective learning methods and “communities of practice“ are seen as the foundation for learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991). In my definition of the concept “teacher competence“ I involve the aspect of personal qualities - or personal competence (Ragnhildur Bjarnadóttir, 2004, 2008a). My definitions are in line with many Nordic researchers, who have argued that teacher competence Markmið kennaranáms
Síða 1
Síða 2
Síða 3
Síða 4
Síða 5
Síða 6
Síða 7
Síða 8
Síða 9
Síða 10
Síða 11
Síða 12
Síða 13
Síða 14
Síða 15
Síða 16
Síða 17
Síða 18
Síða 19
Síða 20
Síða 21
Síða 22
Síða 23
Síða 24
Síða 25
Síða 26
Síða 27
Síða 28
Síða 29
Síða 30
Síða 31
Síða 32
Síða 33
Síða 34
Síða 35
Síða 36
Síða 37
Síða 38
Síða 39
Síða 40
Síða 41
Síða 42
Síða 43
Síða 44
Síða 45
Síða 46
Síða 47
Síða 48
Síða 49
Síða 50
Síða 51
Síða 52
Síða 53
Síða 54
Síða 55
Síða 56
Síða 57
Síða 58
Síða 59
Síða 60
Síða 61
Síða 62
Síða 63
Síða 64
Síða 65
Síða 66
Síða 67
Síða 68
Síða 69
Síða 70
Síða 71
Síða 72
Síða 73
Síða 74
Síða 75
Síða 76
Síða 77
Síða 78
Síða 79
Síða 80
Síða 81
Síða 82
Síða 83
Síða 84
Síða 85
Síða 86
Síða 87
Síða 88
Síða 89
Síða 90
Síða 91
Síða 92
Síða 93
Síða 94
Síða 95
Síða 96
Síða 97
Síða 98
Síða 99
Síða 100
Síða 101
Síða 102
Síða 103
Síða 104
Síða 105
Síða 106
Síða 107
Síða 108
Síða 109
Síða 110
Síða 111
Síða 112
Síða 113
Síða 114
Síða 115
Síða 116
Síða 117
Síða 118
Síða 119
Síða 120
Síða 121
Síða 122
Síða 123
Síða 124
Síða 125
Síða 126

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Beinleiðis leinki

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.