Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Page 26

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Page 26
24 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 5. árgangur 2008 were to a large extent based on expectancy-value theory and self-efficacy theory, putting the focus on students’ expectations and their valuing of schooling and learning, perceptions of ability, perceptions of studying different subjects, and perceptions of themselves as learners. This theoretical framework also guided the development of the questionnaires for parents as well as questions concerning social background factors. A research assistant interviewed students in grade one and filled out a questionnaire based on their responses. In the other grades, the questionnaires were administered by the research team. The population of students and parents in this study was 1310 for each group (parents 1310 and students 1310). The response rate was 76.5% for students and 81.4% for parents. Findings The findings suggest that the motivational level of students is variable between grades 1, 3, 6 and 9. Students in grade 1 were highly motivated towards schooling; 75% said they enjoyed learning. The majority of students in grade 3 were also very motivated, but the ratio of students who claimed to be very motivated had declined down to 62%. The findings also indicate that there was a group of students (5–10%) in grades 1 and 3 that was not very motivated towards learning. The majority of these students were boys. In the higher grades, the students’ motivation continued to decrease. In grade 6, close to half or 48% of the students stated that they enjoyed schooling, but in grade 9 the percentage dropped to only 41%. These findings were reinforced by the views of parents. The difference in motivation of boys and girls grew with increased age. Motivation in grades 6 and 9 towards studying different subject areas was relatively high, but variable between subjects. For example, 55% of students in grade 6 said that they were very or somewhat interested in studying Icelandic language and literature, 66% foreign languages, 47% mathematics, 68% arts, and 84% crafts. However, in grade 9, the motivation to study these subjects decreased, especially for arts and crafts. Mathematics was the only subject where the motivational level stayed the same. Generally, the motivational level of girls was higher than boys for the different subject areas. Discussion The motivational level of students in grades 6 and 9 was lower than in grades 1 and 3. The motivation level for most students in grades 1 and 3 was quite high. However, the lack of motivation of 5–10% of these students is of great concern, particularly for boys who make up the majority of these children. This disinterest in the beginning of schooling will likely create problems of all kinds with increased age. Further research is needed for a deeper understanding of the nature of this lack of motivation. Generally, the motivational level of boys was lower than that of girls in all the grades and this difference increased with age. This trend needs to be further researched and suggests that teaching methods and elements in the learning environment (school and home) of boys and girls need special attention. The motivational level towards studying different subject areas was clearly variable. Students in grade 6 showed high motivation towards studying arts and crafts, but in grade nine this interest had dropped considerably. The motivational level towards academic subjects was generally lower than in arts and crafts in grade 6. The difference in motivation for academic subjects between grades 6 and 9 did not drop as extensively as for arts and crafts. One can speculate whether this variable interest in these subject areas reflects the value society puts on them. Amalía Björnsdóttir, Baldur Kristjánsson og Börkur Hansen
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.