Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Qupperneq 26

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2008, Qupperneq 26
24 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 5. árgangur 2008 were to a large extent based on expectancy-value theory and self-efficacy theory, putting the focus on students’ expectations and their valuing of schooling and learning, perceptions of ability, perceptions of studying different subjects, and perceptions of themselves as learners. This theoretical framework also guided the development of the questionnaires for parents as well as questions concerning social background factors. A research assistant interviewed students in grade one and filled out a questionnaire based on their responses. In the other grades, the questionnaires were administered by the research team. The population of students and parents in this study was 1310 for each group (parents 1310 and students 1310). The response rate was 76.5% for students and 81.4% for parents. Findings The findings suggest that the motivational level of students is variable between grades 1, 3, 6 and 9. Students in grade 1 were highly motivated towards schooling; 75% said they enjoyed learning. The majority of students in grade 3 were also very motivated, but the ratio of students who claimed to be very motivated had declined down to 62%. The findings also indicate that there was a group of students (5–10%) in grades 1 and 3 that was not very motivated towards learning. The majority of these students were boys. In the higher grades, the students’ motivation continued to decrease. In grade 6, close to half or 48% of the students stated that they enjoyed schooling, but in grade 9 the percentage dropped to only 41%. These findings were reinforced by the views of parents. The difference in motivation of boys and girls grew with increased age. Motivation in grades 6 and 9 towards studying different subject areas was relatively high, but variable between subjects. For example, 55% of students in grade 6 said that they were very or somewhat interested in studying Icelandic language and literature, 66% foreign languages, 47% mathematics, 68% arts, and 84% crafts. However, in grade 9, the motivation to study these subjects decreased, especially for arts and crafts. Mathematics was the only subject where the motivational level stayed the same. Generally, the motivational level of girls was higher than boys for the different subject areas. Discussion The motivational level of students in grades 6 and 9 was lower than in grades 1 and 3. The motivation level for most students in grades 1 and 3 was quite high. However, the lack of motivation of 5–10% of these students is of great concern, particularly for boys who make up the majority of these children. This disinterest in the beginning of schooling will likely create problems of all kinds with increased age. Further research is needed for a deeper understanding of the nature of this lack of motivation. Generally, the motivational level of boys was lower than that of girls in all the grades and this difference increased with age. This trend needs to be further researched and suggests that teaching methods and elements in the learning environment (school and home) of boys and girls need special attention. The motivational level towards studying different subject areas was clearly variable. Students in grade 6 showed high motivation towards studying arts and crafts, but in grade nine this interest had dropped considerably. The motivational level towards academic subjects was generally lower than in arts and crafts in grade 6. The difference in motivation for academic subjects between grades 6 and 9 did not drop as extensively as for arts and crafts. One can speculate whether this variable interest in these subject areas reflects the value society puts on them. Amalía Björnsdóttir, Baldur Kristjánsson og Börkur Hansen
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.