Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1978, Side 41

Jökull - 01.12.1978, Side 41
zones with acid intrusions of about same age, however, deserve further discussion. No field evidence has been found to suggest that the zones of strong magnetization are related to feeder channels, or alternatively to a layer within a magma chamber where the heavy iron oxides accumulated during the first stages of magma cooling. The proximity of acid intrusions around both the Hvanna- dalur and Geitafell gabbros, ranging from massive microgranites to mm-thick veins, and occasionally signs of magma mixing on a limited scale, lends support to the hypothésis that the variation of oxygen fugacities in the gabbroic magma might be the primary cause for the variation in the magnetization. The total Fe content in the gabbro samples appears from limited chemical analysis to be more or less constant, but iron oxide enrich- ment has been found in polished sections from the zones of strong magnetization. The observed proportion of the strongly magnetized zones to the whole gabbro volume, 15% and 30% at Geitafell and Hvannadalur localities respectively, is prob- ably not typical for gabbros at large depths, where more homogeneous conditions can be expected. The sheet-like shape of the inves- tigated gabbros with a strike direction almost perpendicular to the eastern rift zone in Ice- land makes it somewhat unlikely that these gabbros are typical products of a spreading process. On the basis of the present field ob- servations it is not possible to enter into a discussion about the mechanism of sheet emplacement. It appears possible, however, that an interpretation of the gabbros in terms of intrusions along minor transverse faults within an old rift zone (= flexure zone of SE Iceland) might explain the shallow position of the gabbros and their strike direction. According to Annels (1967) the gabbros were emplaced ca. 0.5 to 1 km below the surface at the time. Due to the presence of a number of gabbros and numerous sheets within that part of the flex- ure zone where the plateau basalts have been strongest tilted, Walker (1975) suggested that the flexure formed by subsidence caused by the density increase of a solidifying basaltic magma during gabbro emplacement. The Hvannadalur intrusion has been radiometri- cally dated at around 2 M.y. and acid dykes 4.5 km from Geitafell gabbro at around 5 and 7 M.y. (Gale et al. 1966). Local isostatic adjust- ment resulting in a flexure zone less than 10 km wide which formed within a few million years time or less, together with very rapid tilting towards the intrusion centres, requires a substratum of very low viscosity. It is pro- posed here that the substratum was liquid magma in a magma chamber or a chain of magma chambers below the axis of the flexure zone. The solidified part of a magma chamber is thus expected to subside until approximate mass equilibrium is reached. The exposed gabbros within the flexure zone are probably too small to represent the solidified magma chambers but are perhaps some 100 m to 1000 m higher up. The solidified magma chambers constitute perhaps some of the magnetic sources required to form the anomaly patterns in zones of regional extension. The dykes and sheets cutting the gabbros and within the alteration zones around the gabbros (Annels 1967) have génerally only minor magnetization intensities, between 0.5 and 5X 10-3emu/cc. This can be related directly to chemical alteration and oxidation of the magnetic ore components at moderate temperatures. Magnetic anomalies from these dykes and sheets are therefore only of minor importance in the areas investigated. More field work is needed to clarify the structural situation of the investigated gab- bros. Magnetomineralogical investigations are being conducted to clarify the oxidation conditions during crystallization and cooling of the magnetic ore components. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Support from Icelandic authorities, namely the Icelandic Research Council, the National Energy Authority and from the local police station in Höfn, chief Elias Jonsson, is gratefully acknowledged. JÖKULL 28. ÁR 39
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116

x

Jökull

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.