Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1978, Page 41

Jökull - 01.12.1978, Page 41
zones with acid intrusions of about same age, however, deserve further discussion. No field evidence has been found to suggest that the zones of strong magnetization are related to feeder channels, or alternatively to a layer within a magma chamber where the heavy iron oxides accumulated during the first stages of magma cooling. The proximity of acid intrusions around both the Hvanna- dalur and Geitafell gabbros, ranging from massive microgranites to mm-thick veins, and occasionally signs of magma mixing on a limited scale, lends support to the hypothésis that the variation of oxygen fugacities in the gabbroic magma might be the primary cause for the variation in the magnetization. The total Fe content in the gabbro samples appears from limited chemical analysis to be more or less constant, but iron oxide enrich- ment has been found in polished sections from the zones of strong magnetization. The observed proportion of the strongly magnetized zones to the whole gabbro volume, 15% and 30% at Geitafell and Hvannadalur localities respectively, is prob- ably not typical for gabbros at large depths, where more homogeneous conditions can be expected. The sheet-like shape of the inves- tigated gabbros with a strike direction almost perpendicular to the eastern rift zone in Ice- land makes it somewhat unlikely that these gabbros are typical products of a spreading process. On the basis of the present field ob- servations it is not possible to enter into a discussion about the mechanism of sheet emplacement. It appears possible, however, that an interpretation of the gabbros in terms of intrusions along minor transverse faults within an old rift zone (= flexure zone of SE Iceland) might explain the shallow position of the gabbros and their strike direction. According to Annels (1967) the gabbros were emplaced ca. 0.5 to 1 km below the surface at the time. Due to the presence of a number of gabbros and numerous sheets within that part of the flex- ure zone where the plateau basalts have been strongest tilted, Walker (1975) suggested that the flexure formed by subsidence caused by the density increase of a solidifying basaltic magma during gabbro emplacement. The Hvannadalur intrusion has been radiometri- cally dated at around 2 M.y. and acid dykes 4.5 km from Geitafell gabbro at around 5 and 7 M.y. (Gale et al. 1966). Local isostatic adjust- ment resulting in a flexure zone less than 10 km wide which formed within a few million years time or less, together with very rapid tilting towards the intrusion centres, requires a substratum of very low viscosity. It is pro- posed here that the substratum was liquid magma in a magma chamber or a chain of magma chambers below the axis of the flexure zone. The solidified part of a magma chamber is thus expected to subside until approximate mass equilibrium is reached. The exposed gabbros within the flexure zone are probably too small to represent the solidified magma chambers but are perhaps some 100 m to 1000 m higher up. The solidified magma chambers constitute perhaps some of the magnetic sources required to form the anomaly patterns in zones of regional extension. The dykes and sheets cutting the gabbros and within the alteration zones around the gabbros (Annels 1967) have génerally only minor magnetization intensities, between 0.5 and 5X 10-3emu/cc. This can be related directly to chemical alteration and oxidation of the magnetic ore components at moderate temperatures. Magnetic anomalies from these dykes and sheets are therefore only of minor importance in the areas investigated. More field work is needed to clarify the structural situation of the investigated gab- bros. Magnetomineralogical investigations are being conducted to clarify the oxidation conditions during crystallization and cooling of the magnetic ore components. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Support from Icelandic authorities, namely the Icelandic Research Council, the National Energy Authority and from the local police station in Höfn, chief Elias Jonsson, is gratefully acknowledged. JÖKULL 28. ÁR 39
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.