Náttúrufræðingurinn - 2019, Blaðsíða 32

Náttúrufræðingurinn
32
1. Arnþór Garðarsson 1979. Skarfatal 1975. Náttúrufræðingurinn 49. 126–154.
2. Arnþór Garðarsson, Kristján Lilliendahl & Guðmundur A. Guðmundsson 2019.
Fýlabyggðir á Íslandi 2013–2015. Bliki 33. 1–14.
3. Arnþór Garðarsson, Guðmundur A. Guðmundsson & Kristján Lilliendahl 2019.
Svartfugl í íslenskum fuglabjörgum 2006–2008. Bliki 33. 35–46.
4. Arnþór Garðarsson 2019. Íslenskar súlubyggðir. Bliki 33. 69–71.
5. Arnþór Garðarsson 1989. Yfirlit yfir íslenskar súlubyggðir. Bliki 7. 1–22.
6. Arnþór Garðarsson 1995. Fjöldi súlu við Ísland 1989–1994.
Náttúrufræðingurinn 64. 203–208.
7. Arnþór Garðarsson 2005. Súlubyggðir 1999 og framvinda þeirra. Bliki 26. 17–20.
8. Arnþór Garðarsson 2008. Súlutalningar 2005–2008. Bliki 29. 19–22.
9. Þorsteinn Einarsson 1954. Talning súlunnar í Eldey. Náttúrufræðingurinn
24(4). 158–160.
10. Hebblewhite, M. & Haydon, D.T. 2010. Distinguishing technology from biology:
A critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences 365 (1550). 2303–2312.
doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0087
11. Pimm, S.L., Alibhai, S., Bergl, R., Dehgan, A., Giri, C., Jewell, Z., Joppa, L., Kays,
R. & Loarie, S. 2015. Emerging technologies to conserve biodiversity. Trends in
Ecology & Evolution 30(11). 685–696. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.008
12. Marques, T.A., Thomas, L., Martin, S.W., Mellinger, D.K., Ward, J.A., Moretti,
D.J., Harris, D. & Tyack, P.L. 2013. Estimating animal population density using
passive acoustics. Biological Reviews 88(2). 287–309. doi:10.1111/brv.12001
13. Rowcliffe, J.M. & Carbone, C. 2008. Surveys using camera traps: Are we
looking to a brighter future? Animal Conservation 11(3). 185–186. doi:10.1111/j.
1469-1795.2008.00180.x
14. Hussey, N.E., Kessel, S.T., Aarestrup, K., Cooke, S.J., Cowley, P.D., Fisk, A.T.,
Harcourt, R.G., Holland, K.N., Iverson, S.J., Kocik, J.F., Flemming, J.E.M. &
Whoriskey, F.G. 2015. Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the
underwater world. Science 348 (6240). doi:10.1126/science.1255642
15. Kays, R., Crofoot, M.C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. 2015. Terrestrial animal tracking
as an eye on life and planet. Science 348 (6240). doi:10.1126/science.aaa2478
16. Cox, T.H., Nagy, C.J., Skoog, M.A. & Somers, I.A. 2004. Civil UAV capability
assessment. NASA, Houston. 7 bls.
17. Getzin, S., Wiegand, K. & Schöning, I. 2012. Assessing biodiversity in forests using
very high-resolution images and unmanned aerial vehicles. Methods in Ecology
and Evolution 3. 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00158.x
18. Duffy, J.P., Cunliffe, A.M., DeBell, L., Sandbrook, C., Wich, S.A., Shutler, J.D.,
Myers-Smith, I.H., Varela, M.R. & Anderson, K. 2018. Location, location,
location: Considerations when using lightweight drones in challenging
environments. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 4(1). 7–19.
doi:10.1002/rse2.58
19. Anderson, K. & Gaston, K.J. 2013. Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will
revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11.
138–146. https://doi.org/10.1890/120150
20. Varela, M.R., Patricio, A.R., Anderson, K., Broderick, A.C., DeBell, L., Hawkes,
L.A., Tilley, D., Snape, R.T.E., Westoby, M.J. & Godley, B.J. 2019. Assessing
climate change associated sea-level rise impacts on sea turtle nesting beaches
using drones, photogrammetry and a novel GPS system. Global Change Biology
25(2). 753–762. doi:10.1111/gcb.14526
21. Forsmoo, J., Anderson, K., Macleod, C.J.A., Wilkinson, M.E. & Brazier, R.
2018. Drone-based structure-from-motion photogrammetry captures grass-
land sward height variability. Journal of Applied Ecology 55(6). 2587–2599.
doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13148
22. Chabot, D., Craik, S.R. & Bird, D.M. 2015. Population census of a large common
tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft. PLoS ONE 10 (4): e0122588.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122588
23. Christie, K.S., Gilbert, S.L., Brown, C.L., Hatfield, M. & Hanson, L. 2016.
Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: Current and future app-
lications of a transformative technology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environ-
ment 14(5). 242–252. doi:10.1002/fee.1281
24. Jones, G.P., Pearlstine, L.G. & Percival, H.F. 2006. An assessment of small
unmanned aerial vehicles for wildlife research. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(3).
750–758. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[750:aaosua]2.0.co;2
25. Linchant, J., Lisein, J., Semeki, J., Lejeune, P. & Vermeulen, C. 2015. Are un-
manned aircraft systems (UASs) the future of wildlife monitoring?: A review
of accomplishments and challenges. Mammal Review 45(4). 239–252.
doi:10.1111/mam.12046
26. Watts, A.C., Perry, J.H., Smith, S.E., Burgess, M.A., Wilkinson, B.E., Szantoi,
Z., Ifju, P.G. & Percival, H.F. 2010. Small unmanned aircraft systems for
low-altitude aerial surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 74(7). 1614–1619.
doi:10.2193/2009-425
27. Vermeulen, C., Lejeune, P., Lisein, J., Sawadogo, P. & Bouche, P. 2013.
Unmanned aerial survey of elephants. PLoS ONE 8(2): e54700.
HEIMILDIR
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054700
28. Israel, M.A. 2011. UAV-based roe deer fawn detection system. Í: (Ritstj. Eisen-
beiss, H., Kunz, M. & Ingensand, H.) International Archives of the Pho-
togrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Conference on
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in geomatics, Zürich 2011. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-
-XXXVIII-1-C22-51-2011
29. Witczuk, J., Pagacz, S., Zmarz, A. & Cypel, M. 2018. Exploring the feasibility
of unmanned aerial vehicles and thermal imaging for ungulate surveys in for-
ests – preliminary results. International Journal of Remote Sensing 39(15–16).
5504–5521. doi:10.1080/01431161.2017.1390621
30. Arona, L., Dale, J., Heaslip, S.G., Hammill, M.O. & Johnston, D.W. 2018. Assessing
the disturbance potential of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) on gray
seals (Halichoerus grypus) at breeding colonies in Nova Scotia, Canada. PeerJ
6:e4467. doi:10.7717/peerj.4467
31. Geoghegan, J.L., Pirotta, V., Harvey, E., Smith, A., Buchmann, J.P., Ostrowski, M.,
Eden, J.S., Harcourt, R. & Holmes, E.C. 2018. Virological sampling of inaccessi-
ble wildlife with drones. Viruses-Basel 10(6): 300. doi:10.3390/v10060300
32. Christiansen, F., Dujon, A.M., Sprogis, K.R., Arnould, J.P.Y. & Bejder, L.
2016. Noninvasive unmanned aerial vehicle provides estimates of the ener-
getic cost of reproduction in humpback whales. Ecosphere 7(10): e01468.
doi:10.1002/ecs2.1468
33. Oliveira, J.S.F., Georgiadis, G., Campello, S., Brandao, R.A. & Ciuti, S. 2017.
Improving river dolphin monitoring using aerial surveys. Ecosphere 8 (8):
e01912. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1912
34. Evans, L.J., Jones, T.H., Pang, K.Y., Saimin, S. & Goossens, B. 2016. Spatial
ecology of estuarine crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) nesting in a fragmented
landscape. SENSORS 16 (9): 1527. doi:10.3390/s16091527
35. Chabot, D. & Bird, D.M. 2012. Evaluation of an off-the-shelf unmanned
aircraft system for surveying flocks of geese. Waterbirds 35(1). 170–174.
doi:10.1675/063.035.0119
36. Weissensteiner, M.H., Poelstra, J.W. & Wolf, J.B.W. 2015. Low-budget ready-to-
-fly unmanned aerial vehicles: An effective tool for evaluating the nesting status
of canopy-breeding bird species. Journal of Avian Biology 46(4). 425–430.
doi:10.1111/jav.00619
37. McClelland, G.T.W., Bond, A.L., Sardana, A. & Glass, T. 2016. Rapid population
estimate of a surface-nesting seabird on a remote island using a low-cost
unmanned aerial vehicle. Marine Ornithology 44. 215–220.
38. Ratcliffe, N., Guihen, D., Robst, J., Crofts, S., Stanworth, A. & Enderlein, P. 2015.
A protocol for the aerial survey of penguin colonies using UAVs. Journal of
Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3(3). 95–101. doi:10.1139/juvs-2015-0006
39. Sarda-Palomera, F., Bota, G., Padilla, N., Brotons, L. & Sarda, F. 2017. Unmanned
aircraft systems to unravel spatial and temporal factors affecting dynamics of
colony formation and nesting success in birds. Journal of Avian Biology 48(9).
1273–1280. doi:10.1111/jav.01535.
40. Sarda-Palomera, F., Bota, G., Vinolo, C., Pallares, O., Sazatornil, V., Brotons, L.,
Gomariz, S. & Sarda, F. 2012. Fine-scale bird monitoring from light unmanned
aircraft systems. Ibis 154(1). 177–183. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01177.x
41. Þorsteinn Einarsson 1987. Íslenskar súlubyggðir og saga þeirra. Náttúru-
fræðingurinn 57(4). 163–184.
42. Sigurður B. Sívertsen 1971. Viðbót við Suðurnesjaannál. Bls. 307 í: Rauðskinna
hin nýrri III (ritstj. Jón Thorarensen). Þjóðsaga, Reykjavík.
43. Faber, F. 1827. Beyträge zur arctischen Zoologie. Isis 20(8). 633–688.
44. Eggert Ólafsson 1981. Ferðabók Eggerts Ólafssonar og Bjarna Pálssonar
1752–1757 I (þýð. Steindór Steindórsson). Örn og Örlygur, Reykjavík. 365 bls.
(Handriti lokið 1766, frumútg. Sórey 1772).
45. Newton, A. 1861. Abstract of Mr. J. Wolleys researches in Iceland respecting
the garefowl or great auk (Alca impennis Linn.). Ibis 3(12). 374–399.
46. Lög um friðun Eldeyjar, nr. 27/1940. https://www.althingi.is/altext/54/s/
pdf/0485.pdf
47. Auglýsing um friðlýsingu Eldeyjar nr. 119/1974. Stjórnartíðindi B, nr. 119/1974.
https://www.ust.is/library/Skrar/Einstaklingar/Fridlyst-svaedi/Auglysingar/
eldey_119_1974.pdf
48. Brisson-Curadeau, E., Bird, D., Burke, C., Fifield, D.A., Pace, P., Sherley, R.B. &
Elliott, K.H. 2017. Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census.
Scientific Reports 7:17884. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18202-3
49. Vas, E., Lescroel, A., Duriez, O., Boguszewski, G. & Gremillet, D. 2015.
Approaching birds with drones: First experiments and ethical guidelines.
Biology Letters 11: 20140754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0754
50. Grenzdörffer, G.J. 2013. UAS-based automatic bird count of a common gull
colony. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and
Spatial Information Sciences XL-1/W2. 169–174.
51. McEvoy, J.F., Hall, G.P. & McDonald, P.G. 2016. Evaluation of unmanned aerial
vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: Disturbance
effects and species recognition. PeerJ 4:e1831. doi:10.7717/peerj.1831