Læknablaðið - 01.05.2021, Page 22

238 L ÆK N A BL AÐIÐ 2021/107
R A N N S Ó K N
E N G L I S H S U M M A R Y
Sigrún Guðný Pétursdóttir
Jón Magnús Kristjánsson
Hjalti Már Björnsson
The Emergency Department, Landspítali University Hospital
in Reykjavík, Iceland.
Correspondence: Hjalti Már Björnsson, hjaltimb@landspitali.is
Key words: transportation, injuries, alcohol, scooter.
Emergency department visits in Reykjavik for electric
scooter related injuries during the summer of 2020
INTRODUCTION: Electric scooters have become popular in Iceland. The aim of the current
study was to gather data on the incidence, causes, and severity of injuries due to the use of
electric scooters in the Reykjavik area during the summer of 2020.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Individuals presenting to the Emergency Department (ED)
at Landspitali between June 1 and August 31 were asked about the location and cause of
accident, use of protective equipment, and use of recreational drugs and alcohol. Diagnosis
and treatment data was gathered from hospital records.
RESULTS: During the study period, 149 individuals presented with electric scooter
injuries, on average 1.6/day. Patients‘ age ranged between 8 and 77 years, and 45% were
younger than 18 years of age. In 60% of cases the cause of accident was that the patient
was riding too fast, lost balance, or uneven road surface. Seventy-nine percent of children
reported using a helmet, compared to only 17% of adults. No children reported having been
under the influence of alcohol or recreational drugs at the time of the accident, compared to
40% of adults who reported that they were intoxicated. Fractures were diagnosed in 38% of
patients, 6% needed hospital admission, but no patient suffered serious injury.
CONCLUSION: During the summer of 2020, one to two individuals were injured daily in
the Reykjavík capital area while using electic scooters, but no serious injuries occurred.
Preventive measures to decrease injury rate from the use of electric scooters should focus
on infrastructure, encourage helmet use, and education on the risk of injury associated with
operating electric scooters while intoxicated.
doi 10.17992/lbl.2021.05.635
1. Umferðarlög nr 77/2019 althingi.is/lagas/nuna/2019077.html - apríl 2021.
2. Badeau A, Carman C, Newman M, et al. Emergency department visits for electric scooter-
related injuries after introduction of an urban rental program. Am J Emerg Med 2019; 37:
1531-3.
3. Kobayashi LM, Williams E, Brown CV, et al. The e-merging e-pidemic of e-scooters. Trauma
Surg Acute Care Open 2019; 4: e000337.
4. Liew YK, Wee CPJ, Pek JH. New peril on our roads: a retrospective study of electric scooter-
-related injuries. Singapore Med J 2020; 61: 92-5.
5. Trivedi TK, Liu C, Antonio ALM, et al. Injuries Associated With Standing Electric Scooter
Use. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2: e187381.
6. Beck S, Barker L, Chan A, et al. Emergency department impact following the introduction of
an electric scooter sharing service. Emerg Med Australas 2020; 32: 409-15.
7. Aizpuru M, Farley KX, Rojas JC, et al. Motorized scooter injuries in the era of scooter-shares:
A review of the national electronic surveillance system. Am J Emerg Med 2019; 37: 1133-8.
8. Blomberg SNF, Rosenkrantz OCM, Lippert F, et al. Injury from electric scooters in
Copenhagen: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e033988.
9. Mitchell G, Tsao H, Randell T, et al. Impact of electric scooters to a tertiary emergency
department: 8-week review after implementation of a scooter share scheme. Emerg Med
Australas 2019; 31: 930-4.
10. Committee NM-S. NOMESCO Classification of External Causes of Injuries 2007; Fourth
revised edition.
11. aaam.org/abbreviated-injury-scale-ais/ - apríl 2021.
12. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr, et al. The injury severity score: a method for describing
patietns with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974; 14: 187-96.
13. Aradóttir E, Ottósson DB. Örflæði - áhrif á ferðavenjur og viðhorf notenda. Efla verk-
fræðistofa, Reykjavík 2020.
14. Campbell RL, Li JT, Nicklas RA, et al. Emergency department diagnosis and treatment of
anaphylaxis: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014; 113: 599-608.
15. VÍS. Hjólreiðafólk hugar að örygginu! 2016. Reykjavík 2020.
16. Creighton P, Olivier J. 248 Systematic review and meta-analysis of bicycle helmet efficacy to
mitigate head, face and neck injuries. Injury Prevent 2016; 22: A90-A91.
17. Rodgers GB. Factors associated with the crash risk of adult bicyclists. J Safety Res 1997; 28:
233-41.
18. Rissel C, Wen LM. The possible effect on frequency of cycling if mandatory bicycle helmet
legislation was repealed in Sydney, Australia: a cross sectional survey. Health Promot J
Austr 2011; 22: 178-83.
19. Arnarsson A, Kristofersson GK, Bjarnason T. Adolescent alcohol and cannabis use in Iceland
1995-2015. Drug Alcohol Rev 2018; 37 Suppl 1: S49-S57.
20. Jónsson Á, Lárusson SH, Mogensen Á, et al. Komur slasaðra á bráðamóttöku Landspítala
eftir reiðhjólaslys árin 2005-2010. Læknablaðið 2016; 102: 77-82.
21. EEA country fact sheet Iceland 2020. eea.europa.eu/themes/air/country-fact-sheets/
2020-country-fact-sheets/iceland - apríl 2021.
22. Uppruni svifryks í Reykjavík - Rannsóknarverkefni Vegagerðarinnar 2015. Efla verk-
fræðistofa, Reykjavík 2017.
23. Weiss M, Dekker P, Moro A, et al. On the electrification of road transportation - A review of
the environmental, economic, and social performance of electric two-wheelers. Transp Res
D Transp Environ 2015; 41: 348-66.
24. Rix K, Demchur NJ, Zane DF, et al. Injury rates per mile of travel for electric scooters versus
motor vehicles. Am J Emerg Med 2020; 40: 166-8.
Heimildir