Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2002, Qupperneq 140

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2002, Qupperneq 140
138 ECOLOGY OF ENDOPARASITES OFTHE ATLANTIC PUFFIN these two studies are approximately the same with respect to both prevalence and intensity of infestation. Host fitness There is no indication that the fitness of the birds is negatively associated with parasite infestation. As the intensity is relatively low, it is possible that the parasite burden is below the threshold value necessary to have an influence (Hoberg and Ryan, 1989). There have even been speculations that trematodes in frnal hosts may not be para- sitic at all. Lafferty (1997) claimed that adult trematodes have no negative effect on the final host (piscivorous birds). He even argued that frnal hosts may take advantage of trematodes, as the metacercariae change the behavioural pattern of the intermediate host so rendering it more accessible to the birds. This type of symbiosis might be cat- egorized as commensalism, rather than par- asitism. There is a higher mean intensity of ne- matode infestation in puffins with the high- est fitness. As many nematode infested birds had damaged tissue in the anterior part of the oesophagus, evidently caused by the worms, it seems unlikely that the high- er fítness is a direct effect of the parasites. The same pattern has been reported for her- ring infested with Contrcicaecum oscula- tum larvae (Podolska et al., 1997). This trend is probably the result of a higher feed- ing rate. It seems that the nematodes, at low intensities of infestation, are harmless to their hosts. The low fitness of a great black-backed gull (Larus marinus), with a high intensity of the pentastome Reighardia sternae (Bockeler and Vauk-Hentzelt, 1979), was not confirmed in the puffin with a high in- tensity in the present study, and the mean fitness was not reduced in pentastome- in- fested birds, in agreement with Bockeler (1984). The hypothesis that cestode infes- tation leads to natural immunity to pentas- tome infestation (Riley, 1976; Bockelerand Vauk-Hentzelt, 1979) is supported by the present study, as none of the cestode-infest- ed puffins hosted pentastomes. Host gender The sexual bias in the relative intensity of infestation with trematodes (signiilcant) and cestodes (non-significant), with males more heavily infested than females is a puz- zle. There is no evidence that the higher rel- ative intensity of infestation with these helminths is caused by a differentiation in behaviour in relation to reproduction, as the incubation and the feeding of the chick is split equally between the parents (Harris, 1984; Nettleship and Birkhead, 1985), and there does not appear to be evidence of a foraging differentiation in the literature. When birds of both sexes move and feed to- gether they are probably exposed equally to larval parasites. Consequently, if other things are equal, differences in parasite bur- dens should be rare. However, there are studies showing that males and females do differ in susceptibility to parasites, males being the more susceptible (Alexander and Stimson, 1989; Zuk, 1990; Poulin, 1996). One possible explanation is that the effi- ciency of the immune system is determined by migration behaviour in the pre-repro-
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164
Qupperneq 165
Qupperneq 166
Qupperneq 167
Qupperneq 168
Qupperneq 169
Qupperneq 170
Qupperneq 171
Qupperneq 172

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.