Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði - 01.01.2004, Síða 147

Endurgjöf í samtölum
145
244-254. Meddelanden frán Institutionen for nordiska sprák och nordisk litteratur
vid Helsingfors universitet utgivna genom Ann-Marie Ivars och Miija Saari. B:19.
Þórunn Blöndal. 2001. Orðræðugreining. Alfrœði íslenskrar tungu. Ritstjórar Þórunn
Blöndal og Heimir Pálsson. Lýðveldissjóður/Námsgagnastofnun, Reykjavík.
[Margmiðlunardiskur.]
Þórunn Blöndal. 2003. Repeats in Icelandic Conversations - some preliminary obser-
vations. Nordic Research on Relation Between Utterances, bls. 98-109. Proceed-
ings of the NordTalk Symposium at CMOL (CBS) December 2002. Ritstj. Peter
Juel Henrichsen. Copenhagen Working Papers in LSP.
Þórunn Blöndal. 2004a. „Málfræðilega mjög góð í stærðfræði"? Um samtöl sem tæki
til náms. Skima 2,27:17-22.
Þórunn Blöndal. 2004b. „Það er ekkert gaman að vinna einn“. Rannsóknarverkefnið
SAMNÁM: í átt að niðurstöðu. Hrafnaþing 1:120-132.
Þórunn Blöndal. Væntanlegt. Lifandi mál. Inngangur að orðrœðu- og samtalsgrein-
ingu. Rannsóknarstofnun Kennaraháskóla íslands, Reykjavík.
SUMMARY
‘Feedback in Icelandic conversations’
Keywords: feedback, backchannel, Conversation analysis (CA), conversational
storytelling.
This paper discusses verbal feedback in conversational storytelling. Some of the
functions of feedback could be Iooked upon as redundant in storytelling because the
storyteller has already made a sort of an agreement to hold the floor for a longer per-
iod than for a normal turn. He does so with a story preface like “I know a guy who
wanted to go north before Easter” (5) or “then there was one [guy] who was working
with me sko (7)”. The paper reveals that feedback is used quite regularly in the 11
stories scrutinised here. The main findings were that all of the feedback items used in
the stories, belonged to what Allwood (1993) calls “primary basic feedback units”,
mainly já ‘yes’ and mhm. Laughter is also an obvious feedback token. There seems to
be some tendency to choose different feedback items in different parts of the stories.
Thus mhm mainly occurs in the beginning and the middle of the stories and laughter in
the middle and at the end. The location of the feedback is mainly in complex transistion
felevant places, in a micro pause where syntactic, pragmatic and interactional bound-
aries coincide. It is noteworthy that even if there are three or four participants in all
the conversations discussed here, only one person is responsible for giving the feed-
back in each story, probably chosen as a primary addressee by the storyteller.
Þórunn Blöndal
Eennaraháskóla íslands
IS-105 Reykjavík, ÍSLAND
'hblond@khi.is