Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.2007, Page 68

Jökull - 01.12.2007, Page 68
Jónsdóttir and Sveinbjörnsson monitor the migration of a large ice band across the Denmark Strait and into Dýrafjörður, NW-Iceland. A MODIS image from January 25th and an ENVISAT image on the 26th (Figure 6) record the rapid migra- tion of the sea ice under strong winds. During an ice reconnaissance flight on January 28th it became clear that the sea-ice band had been almost entirely pac- ked into Dýrafjörður. It appears that the amount of ice, packed into such a limited space was sufficient to resist melting and create a microclimate within the fjord, as sea ice was forming there while it melted fast in nearby fjords. The next day, winds and tides bro- ught the ice out of the fjord again where it soon melted within the more spacious Denmark Strait. November Through the spring and summer, a long peninsula of spread sea ice remained fairly close to Iceland (Fi- gure 7). It was not until September 21st that no sea ice was observed along our survey line (Figure 3). ENVI- SAT images show that the sea ice lingered close to Scoresbysund throughout the year, growing rapidly in the early autumn (Polar View, 2007). A comparison between the last six years at a similar date at the be- ginning of winter shows that the ice extent was consi- derably higher in 2007 than during the previous years (Figure 8). The sea-ice extent was very low in 2002, due to the mild weather conditions in the Greenland Sea earlier that autumn. On November 18th a blocking high pressure sys- tem started developing SW of Iceland. After a short spell of strong northeasterly direction, the wind tur- ned to SW. The situation from January was repeated, a low pressure system formed off East Greenland, de- epening and increasing westerly windflow in Den- mark Strait. Negative pressure difference between Scoresbysund and Bolungarvík remained until No- vember 23rd, but not as strong as in January (Figure 9). Subsequently, the wind turned northeasterly again and the high pressure system disappeared. Earlier in November, the pressure difference had also been ne- gative, which no doubt explains why the ice edge was so close to Iceland most of the month. During this time, the sea ice was again driven over to Iceland and came within 18 nm of the coast (Figure 10) before the easterly winds drove the ice away. CONCLUSIONS Sea-ice conditions during 2007 have revealed that de- creased amount of sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere is no guarantee for ice-free waters around Iceland. Blocking high pressure systems have brought the ice to the coasts even if the amount of ice in the region was relatively small. The most extreme cases, in Ja- nuary and November 2007, were generated by unusu- ally high pressure difference between Scoresbysund and NW-Iceland with prevailing westerly winds un- der which the sea ice reached the Western Fjords in a few days. As winter started, ice formation and drift south with the East Greenland current began rapidly. ENVI- SAT radar images show areas of sea-ice formation very clearly as very dark regions (little backscatter), and large patches have been observed on those ima- ges in the Autumn. This interpretation has been con- firmed during an ice reconnaissance flight. Initial fluxes of sea ice into Icelandic waters usu- ally consist of spread ice or long and narrow bands. Open access to detailed satellite images, such as radar images or medium resolution optical images, is there- fore essential in order to detect and monitor such sea ice in near real time as it can, even in small concentra- tions, pose severe threats to passing ships as well as near-shore fish farming. For sea-ice historians, observations of sea-ice be- haviour in 2007 are quite important, as they revealed scenarios which would have been hard to understand had they existed in earlier accounts, with a single fjord being packed with ice, whilst the neighbouring fjords are more or less ice free. The satellite images collected in 2007 provide a valuable dataset for studying ice drift and ice thermo- dynamics in more detail, thus hopefully improving fu- ture ice models. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the Icelandic Coast Guard for co-operation on comparing satellite ima- ges with ice observations on ice reconnaissance fli- ghts, Dr. Þór Jakobsson, Eiríkur Sigurðsson, and Sig- þrúður Ármannsdóttir at the Icelandic Meteorological Office for supplying ice reports and information from 66 JÖKULL No. 57
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.