Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.01.2009, Qupperneq 1

Jökull - 01.01.2009, Qupperneq 1
Reviewed research article Comparison of energy balance and degree-day models of summer ablation on the Langjökull ice cap, SW-Iceland Sverrir Guðmundsson1, Helgi Björnsson1, Finnur Pálsson1, and Hannes H. Haraldsson2 1Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, IS-101 Reykjavík, Iceland 2National Power Company of Iceland, Háaleitisbraut 68, 103 Reykjavík, Iceland Abstract— Physical and empirical degree-day models are presented which simulate melting of the Langjökull ice cap in SW-Iceland, during the ablation seasons 2001 to 2005. The models were derived and evaluated using micro-meteorological observations on the glacier and tested with mass balance observations. The observed daily melt rates were successfully simulated by energy balance calculations based on meteorological observa- tions on the glacier. Air temperatures in the low-albedo surroundings of the glacier represent daily variations in the incoming radiation flux better than the damped boundary layer temperature above the melting glacier. Comparison of the empirical degree-day and physical energy balance models indicates that for a regional tem- perature change less than 3 !C, the empirical degree-day model may provide realistic predictions of changes in glacier ablation. INTRODUCTION In order to describe the relationship between climate and the mass balance of glaciers, various physical and empirical models have been presented that are based on measurements obtained either on or away from glaciers. The physical models provide direct es- timates of the energy balance components but they are often impractical due to lack of observations of weather parameters and surface characteristics on the glaciers (e. g. Lang, 1968; Van deWal, 1996). Empiri- cal models describe statistical relations between melt- ing and weather parameters. They are often based on temperature alone that is easily observed and has of- ten been recorded over decades. The temperature ob- servations are either away from the glacier (e. g. Jó- hannesson et al., 1995), or within the glacier boundary layer (e. g. Braithwaite, 1995a). The present paper is a contribution to the discus- sion on melt models, presenting both physical bud- get calculations of energy and empirical degree-day models describing melting. The experimental site is Hagafellsjökull, an outlet glacier of the Langjökull ice cap in SW-Iceland (Figure 1). Radiation com- ponents were measured directly in situ, and turbu- lent fluxes were calculated using wind, air temper- ature and humidity measured in the boundary layer. We examine whether temperature records within the glacier boundary layer or at ice free areas away from the glacier signify better changes in glacial melting. Based on physical models of the energy balance we test the performance of degree-day melt models and their applicability for predicting changes in melt rates in response to changes in regional temperatures. The degree-day models are also tested against mass bal- ance observations at stakes that have not been used for model calibration. LOCATION AND OBSERVATIONS Langjökull is the second largest ice cap in Iceland (925 km2 in area), located in Southwest Iceland at !64.7! N and!20.4!W (Figure 1). Elevations on the glacier surface range from 450 to 1450 m above sea JÖKULL No. 59 1
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.